From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 19 Nov 2002 10:49:39 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 19 Nov 2002 10:49:39 -0500 Received: from nat-pool-rdu.redhat.com ([66.187.233.200]:38887 "EHLO devserv.devel.redhat.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Tue, 19 Nov 2002 10:49:39 -0500 From: Alan Cox Message-Id: <200211191556.gAJFuVG01731@devserv.devel.redhat.com> Subject: Re: Linux 2.5.47-ac6 To: davej@codemonkey.org.uk (Dave Jones) Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2002 10:56:31 -0500 (EST) Cc: alan@redhat.com (Alan Cox), linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <20021119154518.GA560@suse.de> from "Dave Jones" at Nov 19, 2002 03:45:18 PM X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL6] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > and assorted IDE errors. had to use a 2.2 Debian install > to get things off the ground. Strange how 2.2 IDE worked much > better than 2.4's here. Its puzzling but its also hopeful. The 2.4 code is a lot smarter so all we have to do is figure out what smart things we do are not applicable to the RadeonIGP. I've backported the changes to the next 2.4.20-ac tree. Next stop is investigation of audio, usb and the great IDE mystery. You might want to compare the 2.2 and 2.4 ali IDE and look for candidates that upset it.