From: Daniel Jacobowitz <dan@debian.org>
To: "Richard B. Johnson" <root@chaos.analogic.com>
Cc: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kbuild-devel@lists.sourceforge.net,
Kai Germaschewski <kai@tp1.ruhr-uni-bochum.de>
Subject: Re: [RFC/CFT] Separate obj/src dir
Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2002 16:01:57 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20021119210157.GA19881@nevyn.them.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.3.95.1021119153545.6004A-100000@chaos.analogic.com>
On Tue, Nov 19, 2002 at 03:46:28PM -0500, Richard B. Johnson wrote:
> On Tue, 19 Nov 2002, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Nov 19, 2002 at 03:22:45PM -0500, Richard B. Johnson wrote:
> > > I have a question; "What problem is this supposed to solve?"
> >
> > Two problems (at least):
> >
> > 1) You want to compile your kernel based on two different configurations,
> > but sharing the same src. No need to have a duplicate of all src.
> > - There are other ways to do this using symlinks
> >
> > 2) You have the src located on a read-only filesystem.
> > I have been told this is the case for some SCM systems.
> >
> > People has requested this feature at several occasions, and here
> > it is based on the current build system.
> > It's not ready for inclusion (obviously), and you shall
> > also see this as a way to check that this is considered usefull
> > by someone.
> >
> > Sam
>
> Hmmm. If your source is located on a read-only file-system, you
> can't modify it. You are therefore doomed to use only "known working"
> distributions that are known to work with all possible module
> combinations (these don't exist). So you get to compile the kernel
> just as a test exercise or a gimmick like; "what did you do today?..."
> answer; "I compiled the kernel..." This seems to not be very practical
> since the purpose of compiling the kernel was to add something or
> fix something. Now, its just to see if it compiles.
>
> Different configurations are handled with different ".config"
> files.
>
> I think all you did was increase the compile time by writing
> output files to different directories than the ones currently
> in cache. There are a lot of negatives. It would be a shame for
> you to waste a great deal of time on something that would not
> be accepted into the distribution. Remember the earlier `make modules`
> where the new objects went into a separate directory with sym-links?
> That got changed. I think it got changed for good reasons.
There are plenty of other good reasons for this. Offhand:
- Speeds up grepping through the source tree for things if you don't
have to look at object files. SCCS dirs still make this a pain, I may
hack grep -r to optionally skip them.
- Guarantees that doing a build should not affect anything in the srcdir;
this is handy when preparing release tarballs etc.
- Multiple builds from the same source (different architectures,
configs, compilers, whatever) without copying the source.
--
Daniel Jacobowitz
MontaVista Software Debian GNU/Linux Developer
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-11-19 20:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-11-19 20:11 [RFC/CFT] Separate obj/src dir Sam Ravnborg
2002-11-19 20:22 ` Richard B. Johnson
2002-11-19 20:29 ` Sam Ravnborg
2002-11-19 20:46 ` Richard B. Johnson
2002-11-19 20:50 ` Kai Germaschewski
2002-11-19 20:54 ` Sam Ravnborg
2002-11-19 21:37 ` David Woodhouse
2002-11-20 4:04 ` Miles Bader
2002-11-19 21:55 ` Brad Hards
2002-11-19 21:01 ` Daniel Jacobowitz [this message]
2002-11-19 21:19 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2002-11-21 16:54 ` Henning P. Schmiedehausen
2002-11-19 20:31 ` Larry McVoy
2002-11-19 20:43 ` Sam Ravnborg
2002-11-19 20:48 ` Kai Germaschewski
2002-11-19 21:57 ` Sam Ravnborg
2002-11-21 16:53 ` Henning P. Schmiedehausen
2002-11-19 20:51 ` Brian Jackson
2002-11-19 22:05 ` Sam Ravnborg
2002-11-20 6:37 ` Simon Fowler
[not found] ` <mailman.1037774521.18360.linux-kernel2news@redhat.com>
2002-11-20 7:06 ` Pete Zaitcev
2002-11-20 13:10 ` [RFC/CFT] " Alex Riesen
2002-11-20 13:14 ` Alex Riesen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20021119210157.GA19881@nevyn.them.org \
--to=dan@debian.org \
--cc=kai@tp1.ruhr-uni-bochum.de \
--cc=kbuild-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=root@chaos.analogic.com \
--cc=sam@ravnborg.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox