From: Dave Jones <davej@codemonkey.org.uk>
To: Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>
Cc: Margit Schubert-While <margit@margit.com>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: L1_CACHE_SHIFT value for P4 ?
Date: Thu, 21 Nov 2002 13:47:21 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20021121134721.GG9883@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20021121134250.GA31081@wotan.suse.de>
On Thu, Nov 21, 2002 at 02:42:50PM +0100, Andi Kleen wrote:
> http://developer.intel.com/technology/itj/q12001/articles/art_2.htm
> -> "Netburst microarchitecture" -> Level 2 Instruction and Data Cache
> "The L2 cache is organized as an 8-way set-associative cache with 128 bytes
> per cache line. These 128-byte cache lines consist of two 64-byte sectors.
> A miss in the L2 cache typically initiates two 64-byte access requests to the
> system bus to fill both halves of the cache line.
Ok, this makes more sense. (and sounds familiar -- probably the same
thing I was pointed to last time this came up)
> It is refering to the older 256K cached P4, but I doubt they changed it.
> Your cache reporting may refer to the 64byte sectors or is just wrong
I think its counting just the sector. It certainly makes sense.
> (would not be the first time that has happened - some P4 versions also
> misreported their TLB size)
Interesting. I should go read the errata so x86info handles that correctly..
> For cache colouring purposes you need to use the 128 byte unit.
Agreed.
Dave
--
| Dave Jones. http://www.codemonkey.org.uk
| SuSE Labs
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-11-21 13:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <4.3.2.7.2.20021121130236.00b15370@mail.dns-host.com.suse.lists.linux.kernel>
2002-11-21 13:10 ` L1_CACHE_SHIFT value for P4 ? Andi Kleen
2002-11-21 13:23 ` Dave Jones
2002-11-21 13:42 ` Andi Kleen
2002-11-21 13:47 ` Dave Jones [this message]
2002-11-21 15:03 ` Mikael Pettersson
2002-11-21 14:39 Margit Schubert-While
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2002-11-21 13:25 Margit Schubert-While
2002-11-21 13:30 ` Dave Jones
2002-11-21 12:13 Margit Schubert-While
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20021121134721.GG9883@suse.de \
--to=davej@codemonkey.org.uk \
--cc=ak@suse.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=margit@margit.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox