Re: [Benchmark] AIM9 results

Cliff White
2002-12-18T18:39:59Z

> Andrew Morton wrote:
>
> >Andrew Morton wrote:
> >
> >
> >>Hans Reiser wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>>Andrew and Chris, are these changes in performance definitely due to VM
> >>>changes (and not some difference I am not thinking of between 2.5 and
> >>>2.4 reiserfs code)?
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>aim9 is just doing
> >>
> >> for (lots)
> >> close(creat(filename))
> >>
> >>
> > unlink(filename); /* of course */
> >
> >
> >
> >
> Oh, commercial fs vendors must really love tuning for this benchmark....
> sigh....
>
Ya, we think the AIM stuff is getting a little old. The basic idea is fine, but
many of the tests do _very little work. We (OSDL) would like to re-do
AIM9+7 and make it more useful. We'd love to have some input from everyone....
For example, how big a file should we create for a real creat() test ?
cliffw

> Hans
>
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
>