From: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
To: Clemmitt Sigler <siglercm@jrt.me.vt.edu>
Cc: Marcelo Tosatti <marcelo@conectiva.com.br>,
lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Alan Cox <Alan.Cox@linux.org>
Subject: Re: 2.4.20-rc3 ext3 fsck corruption -- tool update warning needed?
Date: Wed, 27 Nov 2002 07:55:48 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20021127125547.GA7903@think.thunk.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.33L2.0211261042290.2368-100000@jrt.me.vt.edu>
On Tue, Nov 26, 2002 at 10:55:10AM -0500, Clemmitt Sigler wrote:
> The e2fsck run seemed to me to go normally. It reported that it
> optimized some directories, but this has happened on other auto-fscks
> of my ext3 filesystems without corruption under earlier kernels. (This
> is the first corruption I've seen in many, many years.) But I didn't
> capture the messages :^( and they don't get written into
> /var/log/messages (that I could find).
Ah, ha. I think I know what happened.
What version of e2fsprogs were you using? If it was 1.28, that would
explain what you saw. There was a fencepost error that could corrupt
directories when it was optimizing/rehashing them. This bug was fixed
in in the next version, which was rushed out the door as a result of
this bug. Fortunately, 1.28 didn't get adopted by any distro's as far
as I know, and not that many people downloaded and compiled e2fsprogs
1.28.
If you're not using the latest version of e2fsprogs, which is
e2fsprogs 1.32, I'd strongly suggest updating to it. Version 1.28 is
just *so* three months ago. :-)
- Ted
P.S. If you do have a directory which is corrupted by e2fsck 1.28, no
data is lost; it just created a directory entry which is too small, so
it triggers the sanity checks in the kernel. Running e2fsck version
1.29 or later will unbork the directory.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-11-27 12:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-11-25 5:12 2.4.20-rc3 ext3 fsck corruption -- tool update warning needed? Clemmitt Sigler
2002-11-25 10:57 ` Hugo Mills
2002-11-25 14:21 ` Clemmitt Sigler
2002-11-26 3:55 ` Theodore Ts'o
2002-11-25 17:15 ` Matthias Andree
2002-11-25 17:39 ` Tomas Konir
2002-11-25 18:37 ` Clemmitt Sigler
2002-11-26 2:47 ` Theodore Ts'o
2002-11-26 15:55 ` Clemmitt Sigler
2002-11-27 12:55 ` Theodore Ts'o [this message]
2002-11-27 14:28 ` Clemmitt Sigler
2002-11-28 22:49 ` Andries Brouwer
2002-11-28 23:47 ` GertJan Spoelman
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2002-11-27 13:39 Margit Schubert-While
2002-11-27 15:18 ` Alan Cox
2002-11-27 20:47 ` Theodore Ts'o
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20021127125547.GA7903@think.thunk.org \
--to=tytso@mit.edu \
--cc=Alan.Cox@linux.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=marcelo@conectiva.com.br \
--cc=siglercm@jrt.me.vt.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox