* Re: [PATCH] named struct initialiser updates [not found] <200211260414.gAQ4EaJ26436@hera.kernel.org> @ 2002-11-29 9:45 ` Geert Uytterhoeven 2002-11-29 11:49 ` Dave Jones 0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread From: Geert Uytterhoeven @ 2002-11-29 9:45 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List On Tue, 26 Nov 2002, Linux Kernel Mailing List wrote: > ChangeSet 1.842.43.47, 2002/11/25 18:40:22-08:00, davej@codemonkey.org.uk > > [PATCH] named struct initialiser updates > diff -Nru a/drivers/video/fbcon.c b/drivers/video/fbcon.c > --- a/drivers/video/fbcon.c Mon Nov 25 20:14:39 2002 > +++ b/drivers/video/fbcon.c Mon Nov 25 20:14:39 2002 > @@ -230,8 +230,9 @@ > > static void cursor_timer_handler(unsigned long dev_addr); > > -static struct timer_list cursor_timer = > - TIMER_INITIALIZER(cursor_timer_handler, 0, 0); > +static struct timer_list cursor_timer = { > + function: cursor_timer_handler > +}; > > static void cursor_timer_handler(unsigned long dev_addr) > { Doesn't this part reverse the timer initializer fix? Gr{oetje,eeting}s, Geert -- Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@linux-m68k.org In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that. -- Linus Torvalds ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] named struct initialiser updates 2002-11-29 9:45 ` [PATCH] named struct initialiser updates Geert Uytterhoeven @ 2002-11-29 11:49 ` Dave Jones 0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread From: Dave Jones @ 2002-11-29 11:49 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Geert Uytterhoeven; +Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List On Fri, Nov 29, 2002 at 10:45:24AM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > > diff -Nru a/drivers/video/fbcon.c b/drivers/video/fbcon.c > > --- a/drivers/video/fbcon.c Mon Nov 25 20:14:39 2002 > > +++ b/drivers/video/fbcon.c Mon Nov 25 20:14:39 2002 > > @@ -230,8 +230,9 @@ > > > > static void cursor_timer_handler(unsigned long dev_addr); > > > > -static struct timer_list cursor_timer = > > - TIMER_INITIALIZER(cursor_timer_handler, 0, 0); > > +static struct timer_list cursor_timer = { > > + function: cursor_timer_handler > > +}; > Doesn't this part reverse the timer initializer fix? Looks like it. I'll take a look later. Dave -- | Dave Jones. http://www.codemonkey.org.uk | SuSE Labs ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2002-11-29 11:44 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <200211260414.gAQ4EaJ26436@hera.kernel.org>
2002-11-29 9:45 ` [PATCH] named struct initialiser updates Geert Uytterhoeven
2002-11-29 11:49 ` Dave Jones
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox