From: Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>
To: Olaf Dietsche <olaf.dietsche#list.linux-kernel@t-online.de>
Cc: James Morris <jmorris@intercode.com.au>,
linux-security-module@wirex.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC] LSM fix for stupid "empty" functions
Date: Sun, 1 Dec 2002 12:05:35 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20021201200535.GA9448@kroah.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <873cph37dh.fsf@goat.bogus.local>
On Sun, Dec 01, 2002 at 07:46:02PM +0100, Olaf Dietsche wrote:
>
> If you want to check, wether a module has been recompiled, you should
> add a length/sizeof(struct security_operations) parameter.
No, I don't want to go down that path. All security modules need to be
compiled against the exact kernel version they are going to be used for,
like any other kernel module type.
thanks,
greg k-h
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-12-01 18:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-12-01 8:30 [RFC] LSM fix for stupid "empty" functions Greg KH
2002-12-01 8:17 ` Crispin Cowan
2002-12-01 17:49 ` Greg KH
2002-12-01 16:59 ` Olaf Dietsche
2002-12-01 18:12 ` Greg KH
2002-12-01 17:21 ` Christoph Hellwig
2002-12-01 18:26 ` Greg KH
2002-12-03 2:37 ` Dragan Stancevic
2002-12-03 16:01 ` Greg KH
2002-12-03 15:14 ` Dragan Stancevic
2002-12-01 17:46 ` James Morris
2002-12-01 18:46 ` Olaf Dietsche
2002-12-01 20:05 ` Greg KH [this message]
2002-12-01 19:25 ` Greg KH
2002-12-02 2:00 ` James Morris
2002-12-02 6:57 ` Greg KH
2002-12-03 8:04 ` James Morris
2002-12-04 0:13 ` [RFC] LSM fix for stupid "empty" functions - take 2 Greg KH
2002-12-04 8:14 ` Chris Wright
2002-12-04 23:00 ` Greg KH
2002-12-04 23:44 ` Chris Wright
2002-12-05 0:09 ` James Morris
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2002-12-01 18:57 [RFC] LSM fix for stupid "empty" functions Adam J. Richter
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20021201200535.GA9448@kroah.com \
--to=greg@kroah.com \
--cc=jmorris@intercode.com.au \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-security-module@wirex.com \
--cc=olaf.dietsche#list.linux-kernel@t-online.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).