public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Marc-Christian Petersen <m.c.p@wolk-project.de>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@conectiva.com.br>, Con Kolivas <conman@kolivas.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] 2.4.20-rmap15a
Date: Sun, 1 Dec 2002 22:41:04 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200212012236.17431.m.c.p@wolk-project.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.44L.0212011921420.15981-200000@imladris.surriel.com>

On Sunday 01 December 2002 22:25, you wrote:

Hi Rik,

> That was my gut feeling as well, but I guess it's a good thing
> to quantify how much of a difference it makes.  I wonder if we
> could convince Con to test a kernel both with and without this
> patch and look at the difference.
yep, would be a good idea. Con: *wake up ;)*

> > So, here my patch proposal. Ontop of 2.4.20-rmap15a.
> Looks good, now lets test it.  If the patch is as needed as you
> say we should push it to marcelo ;)
yep, Andrew should do it. Anyway, all those patches do _not_ get rid of those 
I/O pauses/stops since 2.4.19-pre6. Andrea did a good approach with his 
lowlatency elevator, even if it drops throughput (needs more testing to 
become equivalent to throughput w/o it) and also Con and me did a Mini 
Lowlatency Elevator + Config option, so you can decide weather you are 
building for serverusage where interactive "desktop performance" is not 
needed ;) or not.

I wish I'll have the time to eleminate the broken code which went into 2.4.19 
that causes those I/O stops.

*Repetition: those stopps do not occur with 2.4.18* ;)

ciao, Marc



  reply	other threads:[~2002-12-01 21:34 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2002-12-01 20:56 [PATCH] 2.4.20-rmap15a Marc-Christian Petersen
2002-12-01 21:25 ` Rik van Riel
2002-12-01 21:41   ` Marc-Christian Petersen [this message]
2002-12-01 21:56     ` Con Kolivas
2002-12-02  0:18     ` Con Kolivas
2002-12-02  8:15   ` Jens Axboe
2002-12-02  8:51     ` Andrew Morton
2002-12-02  8:56       ` Jens Axboe
2002-12-02 12:38         ` Rik van Riel
2002-12-02 20:45           ` Willy Tarreau
2002-12-02 23:10             ` Rik van Riel
2002-12-03  6:21               ` Willy Tarreau
2002-12-02 21:46           ` Bill Davidsen
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2002-12-01 20:35 Rik van Riel
2002-12-03 13:55 ` Miquel van Smoorenburg

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200212012236.17431.m.c.p@wolk-project.de \
    --to=m.c.p@wolk-project.de \
    --cc=conman@kolivas.net \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=riel@conectiva.com.br \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox