From: Marc-Christian Petersen <m.c.p@wolk-project.de>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@conectiva.com.br>, Con Kolivas <conman@kolivas.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] 2.4.20-rmap15a
Date: Sun, 1 Dec 2002 22:41:04 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200212012236.17431.m.c.p@wolk-project.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.44L.0212011921420.15981-200000@imladris.surriel.com>
On Sunday 01 December 2002 22:25, you wrote:
Hi Rik,
> That was my gut feeling as well, but I guess it's a good thing
> to quantify how much of a difference it makes. I wonder if we
> could convince Con to test a kernel both with and without this
> patch and look at the difference.
yep, would be a good idea. Con: *wake up ;)*
> > So, here my patch proposal. Ontop of 2.4.20-rmap15a.
> Looks good, now lets test it. If the patch is as needed as you
> say we should push it to marcelo ;)
yep, Andrew should do it. Anyway, all those patches do _not_ get rid of those
I/O pauses/stops since 2.4.19-pre6. Andrea did a good approach with his
lowlatency elevator, even if it drops throughput (needs more testing to
become equivalent to throughput w/o it) and also Con and me did a Mini
Lowlatency Elevator + Config option, so you can decide weather you are
building for serverusage where interactive "desktop performance" is not
needed ;) or not.
I wish I'll have the time to eleminate the broken code which went into 2.4.19
that causes those I/O stops.
*Repetition: those stopps do not occur with 2.4.18* ;)
ciao, Marc
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-12-01 21:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-12-01 20:56 [PATCH] 2.4.20-rmap15a Marc-Christian Petersen
2002-12-01 21:25 ` Rik van Riel
2002-12-01 21:41 ` Marc-Christian Petersen [this message]
2002-12-01 21:56 ` Con Kolivas
2002-12-02 0:18 ` Con Kolivas
2002-12-02 8:15 ` Jens Axboe
2002-12-02 8:51 ` Andrew Morton
2002-12-02 8:56 ` Jens Axboe
2002-12-02 12:38 ` Rik van Riel
2002-12-02 20:45 ` Willy Tarreau
2002-12-02 23:10 ` Rik van Riel
2002-12-03 6:21 ` Willy Tarreau
2002-12-02 21:46 ` Bill Davidsen
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2002-12-01 20:35 Rik van Riel
2002-12-03 13:55 ` Miquel van Smoorenburg
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200212012236.17431.m.c.p@wolk-project.de \
--to=m.c.p@wolk-project.de \
--cc=conman@kolivas.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=riel@conectiva.com.br \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox