From: "David S. Miller" <davem@redhat.com>
To: ak@suse.de
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Start of compat32.h (again)
Date: Mon, 02 Dec 2002 00:28:15 -0800 (PST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20021202.002815.58826951.davem@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <p737kesu9bt.fsf@oldwotan.suse.de>
From: Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>
Date: 02 Dec 2002 09:13:58 +0100
Random sample (with .ehframe stripped):
64bit ls:
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 76672 Oct 25 05:59 /bin/ls
text data bss dec hex filename
64847 7752 1136 73735 12007 /bin/ls
32bit ls:
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 68524 2002-09-09 22:56 /bin/ls
text data bss dec hex filename
65353 1112 872 67337 10709 /bin/ls
[< 1K .text growth, some .data growth due to 64bit pointers]
The data is where I'd say the bloat would be, and lo and behold is a
nearly 7-fold increase for the sample you give us _only_ in the .data
section.
This doesn't even include dynamically allocated data structures,
things that sit on the stack, etc.
I can definitely see the text staying roughly the same, that's not the
big cost, it's the larger data structures.
BTW, I bet your dynamic relocation tables are a bit larger too.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-12-02 8:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <Pine.LNX.4.44.0212011047440.12964-100000@home.transmeta.com.suse.lists.linux.kernel>
[not found] ` <1038804400.4411.4.camel@rth.ninka.net.suse.lists.linux.kernel>
2002-12-02 8:13 ` [PATCH] Start of compat32.h (again) Andi Kleen
2002-12-02 8:28 ` David S. Miller [this message]
2002-12-02 9:07 ` Andi Kleen
2002-12-02 9:36 ` Jakub Jelinek
2002-12-02 17:01 ` Mikael Pettersson
2002-12-02 10:16 ` David S. Miller
2002-12-04 11:19 ` Pavel Machek
2002-12-05 21:06 ` David S. Miller
2002-12-05 21:21 ` Pavel Machek
2002-12-05 21:22 ` David S. Miller
2002-12-05 21:32 ` Pavel Machek
2002-11-27 7:42 Stephen Rothwell
2002-11-27 7:58 ` David S. Miller
2002-11-27 13:00 ` Stephen Rothwell
2002-11-28 5:27 ` David S. Miller
2002-11-27 18:51 ` Linus Torvalds
2002-11-28 5:34 ` David S. Miller
2002-11-27 8:00 ` David Mosberger
2002-11-27 8:06 ` David S. Miller
2002-11-27 8:29 ` Andi Kleen
2002-11-27 8:46 ` David Mosberger
2002-11-27 9:01 ` Andi Kleen
2002-11-27 9:57 ` David S. Miller
2002-11-27 17:10 ` David Mosberger
2002-11-28 5:29 ` David S. Miller
2002-11-27 12:49 ` Alan Cox
2002-11-30 20:34 ` Ralf Baechle
2002-11-27 17:18 ` Linus Torvalds
2002-11-28 5:22 ` Stephen Rothwell
2002-11-28 5:26 ` David S. Miller
2002-11-29 2:36 ` Stephen Rothwell
2002-12-01 18:54 ` Linus Torvalds
2002-12-02 4:46 ` David S. Miller
2002-12-02 4:57 ` Stephen Rothwell
2002-12-02 6:17 ` David S. Miller
2002-12-02 7:39 ` Richard Henderson
2002-12-02 7:44 ` David S. Miller
2002-12-02 7:59 ` Ralf Baechle
2002-12-02 8:01 ` David S. Miller
2002-12-04 11:22 ` Pavel Machek
2002-12-05 21:04 ` David S. Miller
2002-11-28 5:31 ` David S. Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20021202.002815.58826951.davem@redhat.com \
--to=davem@redhat.com \
--cc=ak@suse.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox