Re: [PATCH] 2.5.50-current-bk and EDD

Mike Anderson
2002-12-02T18:52:21Z

Petr Vandrovec [vandrove@vc.cvut.cz] wrote:
> Hi Matt,
> I'm not sure that this patch is correct, but at least I can
> compile kernel now. As I have no SCSI devices in the box, I have
> no idea whether this to_scsi_host() should do same thing as
> to_scsi_host() in drivers/scsi does...
> Thanks,
> Petr Vandrovec
>
>
>
> diff -urdN linux/arch/i386/kernel/edd.c linux/arch/i386/kernel/edd.c
> --- linux/arch/i386/kernel/edd.c 2002-12-02 17:28:11.000000000 +0000
> +++ linux/arch/i386/kernel/edd.c 2002-12-02 17:36:49.000000000 +0000
> @@ -686,8 +686,6 @@
> * The reference counting probably isn't the best it could be.
> */
>
> -#define to_scsi_host(d) \
> - container_of(d, struct Scsi_Host, host_driverfs_dev)
> #define children_to_dev(n) container_of(n,struct device,node)
> static struct scsi_device *
> edd_find_matching_scsi_device(struct edd_device *edev)

This is my bad with some sysfs updates I did recently to scsi. The patch
will make you compile, but the to_scsi_host is host.h does not return the
same data as the previous to_scsi_host in edd.c did if class_data is not
set. Though the "sh" variable is never used in the function
edd_find_matching_scsi_device. I will look over this function some more
and send mail to the list / Matt as to what else might have broke.

-andmike
--
Michael Anderson
andmike@us.ibm.com