From: "Kurt Johnson" <gorydetailz@yahoo.co.uk>
To: riel@conectiva.com.br
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: small doubt about fair-scheduler patch
Date: Mon, 2 Dec 2002 19:25:53 +0000 (GMT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20021202192553.87887.qmail@web13204.mail.yahoo.com> (raw)
Hi,
Im using your fair scheduler patch (2.4.19-fairsched),
applied on top of 2.4.20-rmap15a+read_latency2, and
everything seems great. However, I have one small
doubt, ps output seems a little strange, some
processes appear to be out of order. To illustrate,
here's the output of ps. Im wondering, is this normal?
bash-2.0.5b# ps -eo pid,ppid,user,command
PID PPID USER COMMAND
3 1 root [ksoftirqd_CPU0]
2 1 root [keventd]
5 1 root [kscand]
6 1 root [bdflush]
8 1 root [kreiserfsd]
410 1 root /sbin/dhcpcd eth0
551 1 root [eth1]
613 1 root klogd -x
627 1 root sshd
1 0 root init [3]
682 627 root sshd
685 684 kurt -bash
760 685 root su -
799 1 root xinetd
604 1 root syslogd -m 0
820 1 snmp /usr/sbin/snmpd
841 1 root logger -t safe_mysqld
840 1 root /bin/sh /usr/bin/safe_mysqld
870 840 mysql /usr/sbin/mysqld
4 1 root [kswapd]
894 885 httpd /usr/sbin/httpd -DSSL
893 885 httpd /usr/sbin/httpd -DSSL
885 1 root /usr/sbin/httpd -DSSL
898 885 httpd /usr/sbin/httpd -DSSL
680 1 root portsentry -audp
681 1 root portsentry -atcp
665 1 root crond
7 1 root [kupdated]
761 760 root -bash
684 682 kurt sshd
1003 761 root ps -eo pid,ppid,user,command
Without the fairsched patch, ps output is normal, eg,
init is always the first process listed, all kernel
threads appear at the top (notice kswapd and kupdated
near the bottom), and processes with lower pids never
appear after others with higher (eg, portsentry is 680
and was started before httpd which is 898, yet it
still appears after it). Im just wondering, is this
purely aesthetically or is there something fishy?
Regards,
//kj
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Everything you'll ever need on one web page
from News and Sport to Email and Music Charts
http://uk.my.yahoo.com
next reply other threads:[~2002-12-02 19:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-12-02 19:25 Kurt Johnson [this message]
2002-12-02 20:16 ` small doubt about fair-scheduler patch Rik van Riel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20021202192553.87887.qmail@web13204.mail.yahoo.com \
--to=gorydetailz@yahoo.co.uk \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=riel@conectiva.com.br \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox