From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner+willy=40w.ods.org@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id <S266638AbSLCXjn>; Tue, 3 Dec 2002 18:39:43 -0500
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org
	id <S266637AbSLCXjn>; Tue, 3 Dec 2002 18:39:43 -0500
Received: from nat-pool-rdu.redhat.com ([66.187.233.200]:62040 "EHLO
	devserv.devel.redhat.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id <S266638AbSLCXjm>; Tue, 3 Dec 2002 18:39:42 -0500
Date: Tue, 3 Dec 2002 18:47:05 -0500
From: Arjan van de Ven <arjanv@redhat.com>
To: "Grover, Andrew" <andrew.grover@intel.com>
Cc: "'Arjan van de Ven'" <arjanv@redhat.com>, marcelo@conectiva.com.br,
       linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [BK PATCH] ACPI updates
Message-ID: <20021203184705.A23371@devserv.devel.redhat.com>
References: <EDC461A30AC4D511ADE10002A5072CAD04C7A56D@orsmsx119.jf.intel.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i
In-Reply-To: <EDC461A30AC4D511ADE10002A5072CAD04C7A56D@orsmsx119.jf.intel.com>; from andrew.grover@intel.com on Tue, Dec 03, 2002 at 03:29:56PM -0800
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Tue, Dec 03, 2002 at 03:29:56PM -0800, Grover, Andrew wrote:
> Well maybe that's what we should do - use the UnitedLinux ACPI patch (which

No. What UL did was to put back the code you remove. YOU can do that
better I'm sure, since you actively remove it in your patch;
just not doing that is obviously simpler...