From: Dominik Brodowski <linux@brodo.de>
To: Arjan van de Ven <arjanv@redhat.com>
Cc: Bishop Brock <bcbrock@us.ibm.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, cpufreq@www.linux.org.uk,
linux-pm-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Linux-pm-devel] Re: IBM/MontaVista Dynamic Power Management Project
Date: Thu, 5 Dec 2002 09:18:50 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20021205081850.GA1178@brodo.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1038938270.28176.2.camel@laptop.fenrus.com>
On Tue, Dec 03, 2002 at 06:57:49PM +0100, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> On Tue, 2002-12-03 at 18:46, Bishop Brock wrote:
> > IBM and MontaVista have initiated a joint project to develop a
> > dynamic power management control and policy mechanism for Linux
> > for processors supporting dynamic voltage and frequency scaling.
> > A paper describing the proposal can be obtained from
> >
> > http://www.research.ibm.com/arl/projects/dpm.html
> >
> > A working prototype of the proposed framework for
> > the IBM PowerPC 405LP processor exists and will be made
> > public in the near future.
>
> any idea if/how this will fit into the existing cross platform cpufreq
> framework ?
Actually, if I understand IBM's proposal right, it seems to be an
alternative to cpufreq: a different "mid-layer" between the low-level
processor drivers, other kernel code, and the user. So it's not an extension
to an existing feature, but a new feature - Halloween was some weeks ago...
Dominik
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-12-05 8:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-12-03 17:46 IBM/MontaVista Dynamic Power Management Project Bishop Brock
2002-12-03 17:57 ` Arjan van de Ven
2002-12-03 18:27 ` [Linux-pm-devel] " Hollis Blanchard
2002-12-03 20:00 ` Dominik Brodowski
2002-12-03 20:31 ` Hollis Blanchard
2002-12-05 8:18 ` Dominik Brodowski [this message]
2002-12-03 18:39 ` Alan Cox
2002-12-03 18:45 ` [Linux-pm-devel] " Hollis Blanchard
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2002-12-04 3:34 [Linux-pm-devel] " Bishop Brock
2002-12-05 8:48 ` Dominik Brodowski
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20021205081850.GA1178@brodo.de \
--to=linux@brodo.de \
--cc=arjanv@redhat.com \
--cc=bcbrock@us.ibm.com \
--cc=cpufreq@www.linux.org.uk \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox