From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 6 Dec 2002 19:28:57 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 6 Dec 2002 19:28:56 -0500 Received: from mail.webmaster.com ([216.152.64.131]:59319 "EHLO shell.webmaster.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id convert rfc822-to-8bit; Fri, 6 Dec 2002 19:28:51 -0500 From: David Schwartz To: , "Grover, Andrew" CC: , X-Mailer: PocoMail 2.63 (1077) - Licensed Version Date: Fri, 6 Dec 2002 16:36:13 -0800 In-Reply-To: <20021207002405.GR2544@fs.tum.de> Subject: Re: Proposed ACPI Licensing change Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Message-ID: <20021207003627.AAA12547@shell.webmaster.com@whenever> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sat, 7 Dec 2002 01:24:06 +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote: >On Fri, Dec 06, 2002 at 04:10:00PM -0800, Grover, Andrew wrote: >You can't forbid people to send GPL-only patches, so if a person doesn't >want his patch under your looser license you can't enforce that he also >releases it under your looser license. No, but then you just reject the patch. DS