From: Con Kolivas <conman@kolivas.net>
To: linux kernel mailing list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@digeo.com>
Subject: [BENCHMARK] max bomb segment tuning with read latency 2 patch in contest
Date: Sat, 7 Dec 2002 16:20:01 +1100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200212071620.05503.conman@kolivas.net> (raw)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Here are some io_load contest benchmarks with 2.4.20 with the read latency2
patch applied and varying the max bomb segments from 1-6 (SMP used to save
time!)
io_load:
Kernel [runs] Time CPU% Loads LCPU% Ratio
2.4.20 [5] 164.9 45 31 21 4.55
2420rl2b1 [5] 93.5 81 18 22 2.58
2420rl2b2 [5] 88.2 87 16 22 2.44
2420rl2b4 [5] 87.8 84 17 22 2.42
2420rl2b6 [5] 100.3 77 19 22 2.77
io_other:
Kernel [runs] Time CPU% Loads LCPU% Ratio
2.4.20 [5] 89.6 86 17 21 2.47
2420rl2b1 [3] 48.1 156 9 21 1.33
2420rl2b2 [3] 50.0 149 9 21 1.38
2420rl2b4 [5] 51.9 141 10 21 1.43
2420rl2b6 [5] 52.1 142 9 20 1.44
There seems to be a limit to the benefit of decreasing max bomb segments. It
does not seem to have a significant effect on io load on another hard disk
(although read latency2 is overall much better than vanilla).
Con
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.0 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQE98YUEF6dfvkL3i1gRAn4kAJ4x414sM3G+8fVrXv2P0huRhNKicgCgqFyo
kCXIKMVtO/Zp+tM92qlUz4s=
=HOKs
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
next reply other threads:[~2002-12-07 5:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-12-07 5:20 Con Kolivas [this message]
2002-12-07 5:55 ` [BENCHMARK] max bomb segment tuning with read latency 2 patch in contest Andrew Morton
2002-12-07 6:09 ` Con Kolivas
2002-12-07 6:14 ` Andrew Morton
2002-12-07 6:15 ` GrandMasterLee
2002-12-07 6:20 ` GrandMasterLee
2002-12-07 6:45 ` [BENCHMARK] max bomb segment tuning with read latency 2 patchin contest Andrew Morton
2002-12-07 13:29 ` [BENCHMARK] max bomb segment tuning with read latency 2 patch in contest Con Kolivas
2002-12-10 10:50 ` Miquel van Smoorenburg
2002-12-10 10:55 ` Marc-Christian Petersen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200212071620.05503.conman@kolivas.net \
--to=conman@kolivas.net \
--cc=akpm@digeo.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox