From: Petr Vandrovec <vandrove@vc.cvut.cz>
To: Tomas Szepe <szepe@pinerecords.com>
Cc: Patrick Mochel <mochel@osdl.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@transmeta.com>,
jgarzik@pobox.com
Subject: Re: /proc/pci deprecation?
Date: Sat, 7 Dec 2002 19:52:52 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20021207185252.GC1588@ppc.vc.cvut.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20021207131424.GL32065@louise.pinerecords.com>
On Sat, Dec 07, 2002 at 02:14:24PM +0100, Tomas Szepe wrote:
> > > IMO, yes, since those tools provide the summary, and exist almost purely in
> > > userspace. I forgot to mention in the orginal email that we could also drop
> > > the PCI names database, right? This would save a considerable amount in the
> > > kernel image alone..
> >
> > If you want, make it user configurable like it was during 2.2.x. But
> > I personally prefer descriptive names and system overview I can parse
> > without having mounted /usr to get working lspci.
>
> Actually I'm inclined to insist that lspci belong in /sbin. Really. :)
Try it. At least on Debian it is useless without name database, which lives in
/usr/share/misc/pci.ids... I can read numbers directly from /proc/bus/pci, if
I want numbers.
Petr Vandrovec
vandrove@vc.cvut.cz
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-12-07 18:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-12-06 23:18 /proc/pci deprecation? Petr Vandrovec
2002-12-07 7:44 ` Willy Tarreau
2002-12-07 13:20 ` Tomas Szepe
2002-12-07 19:03 ` Linus Torvalds
2002-12-08 2:56 ` Patrick Mochel
2002-12-08 4:21 ` Linus Torvalds
2002-12-08 20:56 ` Richard Henderson
2002-12-09 1:54 ` Linus Torvalds
2002-12-09 3:59 ` Patrick Mochel
2002-12-13 12:36 ` kernel isapnp (2.4.20) h-peter recktenwald
2002-12-09 13:35 ` /proc/pci deprecation? Ivan Kokshaysky
2002-12-09 14:11 ` Alan Cox
2002-12-09 17:00 ` Linus Torvalds
2002-12-09 18:29 ` Alan Cox
2002-12-09 18:11 ` Linus Torvalds
2002-12-09 18:16 ` Jeff Garzik
2002-12-10 0:43 ` Alan Cox
2002-12-10 0:30 ` Linus Torvalds
2002-12-10 5:57 ` Eric W. Biederman
2002-12-09 23:27 ` Vojtech Pavlik
2002-12-09 14:14 ` Alan Cox
2002-12-10 16:42 ` Martin Mares
2002-12-07 12:35 ` Erik Hensema
2002-12-07 13:15 ` Dr. David Alan Gilbert
2002-12-07 17:46 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2002-12-09 19:03 ` Rogier Wolff
2002-12-09 19:08 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2002-12-07 13:14 ` Tomas Szepe
2002-12-07 18:52 ` Petr Vandrovec [this message]
2002-12-08 12:30 ` Erik Hensema
2002-12-09 10:14 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2002-12-09 11:00 Nicolas Mailhot
2002-12-09 9:15 Adam J. Richter
2002-12-06 21:13 Patrick Mochel
2002-12-06 22:17 ` Jeff Garzik
2002-12-06 22:13 ` Patrick Mochel
2002-12-07 16:23 ` Krzysztof Halasa
2002-12-07 21:18 ` Kai Henningsen
2002-12-08 20:01 ` Krzysztof Halasa
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20021207185252.GC1588@ppc.vc.cvut.cz \
--to=vandrove@vc.cvut.cz \
--cc=jgarzik@pobox.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mochel@osdl.org \
--cc=szepe@pinerecords.com \
--cc=torvalds@transmeta.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox