public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Stephan von Krawczynski <skraw@ithnet.com>
To: Willy Tarreau <willy@w.ods.org>
Cc: ratz@drugphish.ch, willy@w.ods.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: hidden interface (ARP) 2.4.20
Date: Mon, 9 Dec 2002 12:08:14 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20021209120814.2eaaef29.skraw@ithnet.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20021208170135.GA354@alpha.home.local>

On Sun, 8 Dec 2002 18:01:35 +0100
Willy Tarreau <willy@w.ods.org> wrote:

> > I guess it would really be a great help if someone did tests like Cons'
> > "overall performance" ones for network performance explicitly. Like e.g.
> > performance for various packet-sizes of all available protocol types,
> > possibly including NAT connections. We have no comparable figures at hand
> > right now, I guess.
> 
> Why not ?
> I've often been doing this to check the reliability of the network layer of
> kernels that I distribute. I often use Tux for this, because it can easily
> sustain 10k hits/s during months.

This is unfortunately not sufficient, not even close to. If you really want to
have a good idea what is going on you should as well check out what is happening
with packet sizes a lot smaller than 1500 (normal mtu). Check data rate an
packet loss with packet sizes around 80 bytes or so to get an idea what bothers
us :-)

-- 
Regards,
Stephan

  reply	other threads:[~2002-12-09 11:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2002-12-05 20:53 hidden interface (ARP) 2.4.20 Bingner Sam J Contractor PACAF CSS/SCHE
2002-12-05 21:42 ` David S. Miller
2002-12-05 22:03   ` Phil Oester
2002-12-05 22:50     ` Roberto Nibali
2002-12-05 23:48       ` Phil Oester
2002-12-05 23:59         ` Roberto Nibali
2002-12-06  6:01           ` Willy Tarreau
2002-12-06 17:52             ` Stephan von Krawczynski
2002-12-07 23:30             ` Roberto Nibali
2002-12-08 16:03               ` Stephan von Krawczynski
2002-12-08 17:01                 ` Willy Tarreau
2002-12-09 11:08                   ` Stephan von Krawczynski [this message]
2002-12-10  9:42                     ` Gilad Ben-Yossef
2002-12-10 10:40                     ` Roberto Nibali
2002-12-10 13:09                       ` hidden interface (ARP) 2.4.20 / network performance Stephan von Krawczynski
2002-12-10 18:11                         ` Roberto Nibali
2002-12-10 23:29                         ` Willy TARREAU
2002-12-10  1:22           ` hidden interface (ARP) 2.4.20 Bill Davidsen
2002-12-10 10:40             ` Roberto Nibali
2002-12-10 14:47               ` Bill Davidsen
2002-12-10 18:15                 ` Roberto Nibali
2002-12-11 16:15                   ` Bill Davidsen
2002-12-12  1:33                     ` Bernd Eckenfels
2002-12-05 22:18   ` Martin Josefsson
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2002-12-05 23:57 Bingner Sam J Contractor PACAF CSS/SCHE

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20021209120814.2eaaef29.skraw@ithnet.com \
    --to=skraw@ithnet.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=ratz@drugphish.ch \
    --cc=willy@w.ods.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox