From: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@pobox.com>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@transmeta.com>
Cc: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
Richard Henderson <rth@twiddle.net>,
Patrick Mochel <mochel@osdl.org>, Willy Tarreau <willy@w.ods.org>,
Petr Vandrovec <VANDROVE@vc.cvut.cz>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: /proc/pci deprecation?
Date: Mon, 9 Dec 2002 13:16:18 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20021209181618.GE17495@gtf.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0212090958140.10925-100000@home.transmeta.com>
On Mon, Dec 09, 2002 at 10:11:39AM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
>
> On 9 Dec 2002, Alan Cox wrote:
> >
> > Tested and verified. If I leave it alone non apic mode works. To use
> > APIC mode I have to write the new IRQ value into that register. I've
> > shoved that into the driver for now, since its a demented chip specific
> > horror.
>
> That's definitely where it should be - the behaviour of the
> PCI_INTERRUPT_LINE register is clearly chip-specific, so it should be in
> the chip-specific drivers..
>
> It's a kind of strange behaviour, though. What chip is this? It sounds
> kind of convenient, but as far as I can tell it can only work for those
> kinds of PCI devices that are on the same chip as the irq controller..
As a reminder of ancient times, one of the reasons I wanted to do
per-PCI-device interrupt routing was due to the older incarnation of
these chips, the Via 686 a/b southbridges. They have a similar method
of routing interrupts, where writing to PCI_INTERRUPT_LINE directly
makes internal chip magic occur. So you are correct WRT
"only work ... on the same chip as the irq controller"
Jeff
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-12-09 18:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-12-06 23:18 /proc/pci deprecation? Petr Vandrovec
2002-12-07 7:44 ` Willy Tarreau
2002-12-07 13:20 ` Tomas Szepe
2002-12-07 19:03 ` Linus Torvalds
2002-12-08 2:56 ` Patrick Mochel
2002-12-08 4:21 ` Linus Torvalds
2002-12-08 20:56 ` Richard Henderson
2002-12-09 1:54 ` Linus Torvalds
2002-12-09 3:59 ` Patrick Mochel
2002-12-13 12:36 ` kernel isapnp (2.4.20) h-peter recktenwald
2002-12-09 13:35 ` /proc/pci deprecation? Ivan Kokshaysky
2002-12-09 14:11 ` Alan Cox
2002-12-09 17:00 ` Linus Torvalds
2002-12-09 18:29 ` Alan Cox
2002-12-09 18:11 ` Linus Torvalds
2002-12-09 18:16 ` Jeff Garzik [this message]
2002-12-10 0:43 ` Alan Cox
2002-12-10 0:30 ` Linus Torvalds
2002-12-10 5:57 ` Eric W. Biederman
2002-12-09 23:27 ` Vojtech Pavlik
2002-12-09 14:14 ` Alan Cox
2002-12-10 16:42 ` Martin Mares
2002-12-07 12:35 ` Erik Hensema
2002-12-07 13:15 ` Dr. David Alan Gilbert
2002-12-07 17:46 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2002-12-09 19:03 ` Rogier Wolff
2002-12-09 19:08 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2002-12-07 13:14 ` Tomas Szepe
2002-12-07 18:52 ` Petr Vandrovec
2002-12-08 12:30 ` Erik Hensema
2002-12-09 10:14 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2002-12-09 11:00 Nicolas Mailhot
2002-12-09 9:15 Adam J. Richter
2002-12-06 21:13 Patrick Mochel
2002-12-06 22:17 ` Jeff Garzik
2002-12-06 22:13 ` Patrick Mochel
2002-12-07 16:23 ` Krzysztof Halasa
2002-12-07 21:18 ` Kai Henningsen
2002-12-08 20:01 ` Krzysztof Halasa
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20021209181618.GE17495@gtf.org \
--to=jgarzik@pobox.com \
--cc=VANDROVE@vc.cvut.cz \
--cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mochel@osdl.org \
--cc=rth@twiddle.net \
--cc=torvalds@transmeta.com \
--cc=willy@w.ods.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox