From: "David S. Miller" <davem@redhat.com>
To: sfr@canb.auug.org.au
Cc: torvalds@transmeta.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
anton@samba.org, ak@muc.de, davidm@hpl.hp.com,
schwidefsky@de.ibm.com, ralf@gnu.org, willy@debian.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH][COMPAT] consolidate sys32_new[lf]stat - architecture independent
Date: Thu, 12 Dec 2002 21:32:31 -0800 (PST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20021212.213231.63672402.davem@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20021213153439.1f3e466e.sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Date: Fri, 13 Dec 2002 15:34:39 +1100
Another in the COMPAT series. This build on the previous patches.
I'm totally fine with this stuff (and the sparc64 specific part), but
watch out, this patch removes the kernel/compat.c utimes stuff :-)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-12-13 5:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-12-13 4:34 [PATCH][COMPAT] consolidate sys32_new[lf]stat - architecture independent Stephen Rothwell
2002-12-13 4:37 ` [PATCH][COMPAT] consolidate sys32_new[lf]stat - ppc64 Stephen Rothwell
2002-12-13 4:39 ` [PATCH][COMPAT] consolidate sys32_new[lf]stat - sparc64 Stephen Rothwell
2002-12-13 4:43 ` [PATCH][COMPAT] consolidate sys32_new[lf]stat - x86_64 Stephen Rothwell
2002-12-13 4:44 ` [PATCH][COMPAT] consolidate sys32_new[lf]stat - ia64 Stephen Rothwell
2002-12-13 4:46 ` [PATCH][COMPAT] consolidate sys32_new[lf]stat - s390x Stephen Rothwell
2002-12-13 4:48 ` [PATCH][COMPAT] consolidate sys32_new[lf]stat - mips64 Stephen Rothwell
2002-12-13 4:51 ` [PATCH][COMPAT] consolidate sys32_new[lf]stat - parisc Stephen Rothwell
2002-12-13 5:32 ` David S. Miller [this message]
2002-12-13 6:18 ` [PATCH][COMPAT] consolidate sys32_new[lf]stat - architecture independent Stephen Rothwell
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20021212.213231.63672402.davem@redhat.com \
--to=davem@redhat.com \
--cc=ak@muc.de \
--cc=anton@samba.org \
--cc=davidm@hpl.hp.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ralf@gnu.org \
--cc=schwidefsky@de.ibm.com \
--cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
--cc=torvalds@transmeta.com \
--cc=willy@debian.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox