* "bio too big" error
@ 2002-12-11 2:17 Wil Reichert
2002-12-11 2:44 ` Andrew Morton
2002-12-12 12:08 ` Joe Thornber
0 siblings, 2 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: Wil Reichert @ 2002-12-11 2:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-kernel
Hi,
I'm getting a "bio too big" error with 2.5.50. I've got a 330G lvm2
partition formatted with ext3 using the -T largefile4 parameter.
Everything seems ok at first, but any sort of access will die very
unhappily with said error messsage after about 10 seconds of operation
or so. The only google search results are the patch submission. Eeek.
Wil
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* Re: "bio too big" error
2002-12-11 2:17 "bio too big" error Wil Reichert
@ 2002-12-11 2:44 ` Andrew Morton
2002-12-11 3:38 ` Wil Reichert
2002-12-12 12:08 ` Joe Thornber
1 sibling, 1 reply; 17+ messages in thread
From: Andrew Morton @ 2002-12-11 2:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Wil Reichert, Jens Axboe; +Cc: linux-kernel
Wil Reichert wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I'm getting a "bio too big" error with 2.5.50. I've got a 330G lvm2
> partition formatted with ext3 using the -T largefile4 parameter.
> Everything seems ok at first, but any sort of access will die very
> unhappily with said error messsage after about 10 seconds of operation
> or so. The only google search results are the patch submission. Eeek.
>
How odd.
Please send the full diagnostic output.
And add this:
--- 25/drivers/block/ll_rw_blk.c~a Tue Dec 10 18:42:54 2002
+++ 25-akpm/drivers/block/ll_rw_blk.c Tue Dec 10 18:43:13 2002
@@ -1921,6 +1921,7 @@ end_io:
bdevname(bio->bi_bdev),
bio_sectors(bio),
q->max_sectors);
+ dump_stack();
goto end_io;
}
_
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* Re: "bio too big" error
2002-12-11 2:44 ` Andrew Morton
@ 2002-12-11 3:38 ` Wil Reichert
2002-12-11 5:11 ` Greg KH
` (2 more replies)
0 siblings, 3 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: Wil Reichert @ 2002-12-11 3:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Andrew Morton; +Cc: Jens Axboe, linux-kernel
Exact error with debug is:
darwin:/a01/mp3s/Skinny Puppy/Too Dark Park# ogg123 -q 01\ -\
Convulsion.ogg
bio too big device ide0(3,4) (256 > 255)
Call Trace: [<c020055e>] [<e09ff46d>] [<e09ff558>] [<e09ff5f5>]
[<c020050a>] [<c02005f4>] [<c017048e>] [<c0170a79>] [<c0187770>]
[<c01472e6>] [<c0187770>] [<c0140edd>] [<c01977fc>] [<c01473e4>]
[<c01475be>] [<c0137ac8>] [<c0137e60>] [<c0138124>] [<c0137e60>]
[<c01381ca>] [<c014eadb>] [<c01094cb>]
[<e09def98>] [<c01113bf>] [<c0110ac2>] [<c014ebce>] [<c014ee6e>]
[<c010967f>]
I'm guessing its perhaps a 2.5 / lvm issue? Here's 'vgdisplay -v' in
case:
Finding all volume groups
Finding volume group "cheese_vg"
--- Volume group ---
VG Name cheese_vg
System ID darwin1025684717
Format lvm2
Metadata Areas 6
Metadata Sequence No 1
VG Access read/write
VG Status resizable
MAX LV 256
Cur LV 1
Open LV 1
Max PV 256
Cur PV 5
Act PV 5
VG Size 330.05 GB
PE Size 16.00 MB
Total PE 21123
Alloc PE / Size 21123 / 330.05 GB
Free PE / Size 0 / 0
VG UUID WF3vAx-k1r3-NUjU-az7z-I4SM-oorx-rvoYSt
--- Logical volume ---
LV Name /dev/cheese_vg/blah
VG Name cheese_vg
LV UUID 000000-0000-0000-0000-0000-0000-000000
LV Write Access read/write
LV Status available
# open 1
LV Size 330.05 GB
Current LE 21123
Segments 7
Allocation next free
Read ahead sectors 1024
Block device 254:0
--- Physical volumes ---
PV Name /dev/discs/disc1/disc
PV Status allocatable
Total PE / Free PE 4769 / 0
PV Name /dev/ide/host2/bus0/target0/lun0/disc
PV Status allocatable
Total PE / Free PE 7361 / 0
PV Name /dev/ide/host2/bus1/target0/lun0/disc
PV Status allocatable
Total PE / Free PE 5961 / 0
PV Name /dev/discs/disc0/part4
PV Status allocatable
Total PE / Free PE 2431 / 0
PV Name /dev/discs/disc4/disc
PV Status allocatable
Total PE / Free PE 601 / 0
Wil
On Tue, 2002-12-10 at 21:44, Andrew Morton wrote:
> Wil Reichert wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > I'm getting a "bio too big" error with 2.5.50. I've got a 330G lvm2
> > partition formatted with ext3 using the -T largefile4 parameter.
> > Everything seems ok at first, but any sort of access will die very
> > unhappily with said error messsage after about 10 seconds of operation
> > or so. The only google search results are the patch submission. Eeek.
> >
>
> How odd.
>
> Please send the full diagnostic output.
>
> And add this:
>
>
> --- 25/drivers/block/ll_rw_blk.c~a Tue Dec 10 18:42:54 2002
> +++ 25-akpm/drivers/block/ll_rw_blk.c Tue Dec 10 18:43:13 2002
> @@ -1921,6 +1921,7 @@ end_io:
> bdevname(bio->bi_bdev),
> bio_sectors(bio),
> q->max_sectors);
> + dump_stack();
> goto end_io;
> }
>
>
> _
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
--
Wil Reichert <wilreichert@yahoo.com>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread* Re: "bio too big" error
2002-12-11 3:38 ` Wil Reichert
@ 2002-12-11 5:11 ` Greg KH
2002-12-11 13:40 ` Wil Reichert
2002-12-11 5:18 ` Andrew Morton
2002-12-11 7:21 ` Jens Axboe
2 siblings, 1 reply; 17+ messages in thread
From: Greg KH @ 2002-12-11 5:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Wil Reichert; +Cc: Andrew Morton, Jens Axboe, linux-kernel
On Tue, Dec 10, 2002 at 10:38:58PM -0500, Wil Reichert wrote:
>
> I'm guessing its perhaps a 2.5 / lvm issue? Here's 'vgdisplay -v' in
> case:
Did you try the dm patches that were just posted to lkml today?
thanks,
greg k-h
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* Re: "bio too big" error
2002-12-11 3:38 ` Wil Reichert
2002-12-11 5:11 ` Greg KH
@ 2002-12-11 5:18 ` Andrew Morton
2002-12-11 12:09 ` Wil Reichert
2002-12-11 7:21 ` Jens Axboe
2 siblings, 1 reply; 17+ messages in thread
From: Andrew Morton @ 2002-12-11 5:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Wil Reichert; +Cc: linux-kernel
Wil Reichert wrote:
>
> Exact error with debug is:
>
> darwin:/a01/mp3s/Skinny Puppy/Too Dark Park# ogg123 -q 01\ -\
> Convulsion.ogg
> bio too big device ide0(3,4) (256 > 255)
> Call Trace: [<c020055e>] [<e09ff46d>] [<e09ff558>] [<e09ff5f5>]
> [<c020050a>] [<c02005f4>] [<c017048e>] [<c0170a79>] [<c0187770>]
> [<c01472e6>] [<c0187770>] [<c0140edd>] [<c01977fc>] [<c01473e4>]
> [<c01475be>] [<c0137ac8>] [<c0137e60>] [<c0138124>] [<c0137e60>]
> [<c01381ca>] [<c014eadb>] [<c01094cb>]
> [<e09def98>] [<c01113bf>] [<c0110ac2>] [<c014ebce>] [<c014ee6e>]
> [<c010967f>]
>
Could you please enable CONFIG_KALLSYMS and regenerate the backtrace?
Thanks.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* Re: "bio too big" error
2002-12-11 5:18 ` Andrew Morton
@ 2002-12-11 12:09 ` Wil Reichert
0 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: Wil Reichert @ 2002-12-11 12:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Andrew Morton; +Cc: linux-kernel
Could you please enable CONFIG_KALLSYMS and regenerate the backtrace?
darwin:~$ cp /a01/movies/metropolis.avi .
bio too big device ide2(33,0) (256 > 255)
Call Trace:
[<c02035ee>] generic_make_request+0x1ce/0x210
[<e093046d>] __clone_and_map+0xbd/0x120 [dm_mod]
[<e0930558>] __split_bio+0x88/0xb0 [dm_mod]
[<e09305f5>] dm_request+0x75/0xb0 [dm_mod]
[<c020359a>] generic_make_request+0x17a/0x210
[<c01dd314>] radix_tree_extend+0x64/0x90
[<c0203684>] submit_bio+0x54/0xa0
[<c017209e>] mpage_bio_submit+0x2e/0x40
[<c0172689>] mpage_readpages+0xc9/0x160
[<c0189780>] ext3_get_block+0x0/0xb0
[<c013a526>] read_pages+0x116/0x120
[<c0189780>] ext3_get_block+0x0/0xb0
[<c013853d>] __alloc_pages+0x8d/0x290
[<c013a624>] do_page_cache_readahead+0xf4/0x180
[<c013a7fe>] page_cache_readahead+0x14e/0x190
[<c0135168>] do_generic_mapping_read+0xb8/0x410
[<c0154443>] __block_commit_write+0x93/0xa0
[<c0135500>] file_read_actor+0x0/0xf0
[<c01357c4>] __generic_file_aio_read+0x1d4/0x220
[<c0135500>] file_read_actor+0x0/0xf0
[<c013586a>] generic_file_aio_read+0x5a/0x80
[<c015076b>] do_sync_read+0x8b/0xc0
[<c0136e3c>] generic_file_write+0x5c/0x80
[<c015085e>] vfs_read+0xbe/0x130
[<c0150afe>] sys_read+0x3e/0x60
[<c01096af>] syscall_call+0x7/0xb
Wil
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* Re: "bio too big" error
2002-12-11 3:38 ` Wil Reichert
2002-12-11 5:11 ` Greg KH
2002-12-11 5:18 ` Andrew Morton
@ 2002-12-11 7:21 ` Jens Axboe
2002-12-12 9:22 ` Joe Thornber
2 siblings, 1 reply; 17+ messages in thread
From: Jens Axboe @ 2002-12-11 7:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Wil Reichert; +Cc: Andrew Morton, linux-kernel
On Tue, Dec 10 2002, Wil Reichert wrote:
> Exact error with debug is:
>
> darwin:/a01/mp3s/Skinny Puppy/Too Dark Park# ogg123 -q 01\ -\
> Convulsion.ogg
> bio too big device ide0(3,4) (256 > 255)
looks like a one-off in the dm merge_bvec function.
--
Jens Axboe
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* Re: "bio too big" error
2002-12-11 7:21 ` Jens Axboe
@ 2002-12-12 9:22 ` Joe Thornber
0 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: Joe Thornber @ 2002-12-12 9:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jens Axboe; +Cc: Wil Reichert, Andrew Morton, linux-kernel
On Wed, Dec 11, 2002 at 08:21:39AM +0100, Jens Axboe wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 10 2002, Wil Reichert wrote:
> > Exact error with debug is:
> >
> > darwin:/a01/mp3s/Skinny Puppy/Too Dark Park# ogg123 -q 01\ -\
> > Convulsion.ogg
> > bio too big device ide0(3,4) (256 > 255)
>
> looks like a one-off in the dm merge_bvec function.
Nope, we're not using merge_bvec yet. Kevin Corry has convinced me
that there is a bug in dms bv splitting code, I'll put out a new
patchset later. However the known bug wouldn't have a stack trace
like this.
- Joe
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* Re: "bio too big" error
2002-12-11 2:17 "bio too big" error Wil Reichert
2002-12-11 2:44 ` Andrew Morton
@ 2002-12-12 12:08 ` Joe Thornber
2002-12-12 18:34 ` Wil Reichert
1 sibling, 1 reply; 17+ messages in thread
From: Joe Thornber @ 2002-12-12 12:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Wil Reichert; +Cc: linux-kernel
On Tue, Dec 10, 2002 at 09:17:45PM -0500, Wil Reichert wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm getting a "bio too big" error with 2.5.50. I've got a 330G lvm2
> partition formatted with ext3 using the -T largefile4 parameter.
> Everything seems ok at first, but any sort of access will die very
> unhappily with said error messsage after about 10 seconds of operation
> or so. The only google search results are the patch submission. Eeek.
Could you try the patchset below please ? (you may need to knock out
patch 5 until we get to the bottom of that particular bug).
http://people.sistina.com/~thornber/patches/2.5-stable/2.5.51/2.5.51-dm-2.tar.bz2
- Joe
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* Re: "bio too big" error
2002-12-12 12:08 ` Joe Thornber
@ 2002-12-12 18:34 ` Wil Reichert
2002-12-12 20:29 ` Joe Thornber
0 siblings, 1 reply; 17+ messages in thread
From: Wil Reichert @ 2002-12-12 18:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Joe Thornber; +Cc: linux-kernel
Yeah, ditching patch 5 makes my lvm functional again. Things are
definately better now. I haven't attempted to stress it, but the entire
hanging console / zombie process bit has gone away. Everything appears
to work normally. A couple test cp's shows nothing abnormal, but
playing an ogg still results in the following.
Dec 12 13:32:20 darwin kernel: bio too big device ide2(33,0) (256 > 255)
Dec 12 13:32:51 darwin last message repeated 3 times
Dec 12 13:33:55 darwin last message repeated 6 times
Any other tests I should do?
Wil
On Thu, 2002-12-12 at 07:08, Joe Thornber wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 10, 2002 at 09:17:45PM -0500, Wil Reichert wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I'm getting a "bio too big" error with 2.5.50. I've got a 330G lvm2
> > partition formatted with ext3 using the -T largefile4 parameter.
> > Everything seems ok at first, but any sort of access will die very
> > unhappily with said error messsage after about 10 seconds of operation
> > or so. The only google search results are the patch submission. Eeek.
>
> Could you try the patchset below please ? (you may need to knock out
> patch 5 until we get to the bottom of that particular bug).
>
> http://people.sistina.com/~thornber/patches/2.5-stable/2.5.51/2.5.51-dm-2.tar.bz2
>
> - Joe
--
Wil Reichert <wilreichert@yahoo.com>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* Re: "bio too big" error
2002-12-12 18:34 ` Wil Reichert
@ 2002-12-12 20:29 ` Joe Thornber
0 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: Joe Thornber @ 2002-12-12 20:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Wil Reichert; +Cc: Joe Thornber, linux-kernel
On Thu, Dec 12, 2002 at 01:34:59PM -0500, Wil Reichert wrote:
> Yeah, ditching patch 5 makes my lvm functional again. Things are
> definately better now. I haven't attempted to stress it, but the entire
> hanging console / zombie process bit has gone away. Everything appears
> to work normally. A couple test cp's shows nothing abnormal, but
> playing an ogg still results in the following.
>
> Dec 12 13:32:20 darwin kernel: bio too big device ide2(33,0) (256 > 255)
> Dec 12 13:32:51 darwin last message repeated 3 times
> Dec 12 13:33:55 darwin last message repeated 6 times
>
> Any other tests I should do?
I'm now seeing some corruption with large files, so I'll fix that and
hope that it solves your problem too. wrt. the device size bug that
you're experiencing could you mail me (not the list) your .config
please ?
- Joe
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* Re: Confusing help texts?
@ 2002-12-11 23:45 Greg KH
2002-12-12 0:15 ` "bio too big" error Wil Reichert
0 siblings, 1 reply; 17+ messages in thread
From: Greg KH @ 2002-12-11 23:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Pavel Machek; +Cc: kernel list
On Wed, Dec 11, 2002 at 11:44:22PM +0100, Pavel Machek wrote:
> Hi!
>
> + * Prevents any programs running with egid == 0 if a specific USB device
> + * is not present in the system. Yes, it can be gotten around, but is a
> + * nice starting point for people to play with, and learn the LSM
> + * interface.
>
> How can you "prevent any program"?
Heh, it's confusing, sorry.
>
> + It enables control over processes being created by root users
> + if a specific USB device is not present in the system.
>
> Enables control over processes?
Basically, if the USB device is not in the system, then you can not
start any new program as egid = 0. That's all.
Patches gladly accepted to clean this stuff up :)
thanks,
greg k-h
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* Re: "bio too big" error
2002-12-11 23:45 Confusing help texts? Greg KH
@ 2002-12-12 0:15 ` Wil Reichert
2002-12-12 9:12 ` Joe Thornber
0 siblings, 1 reply; 17+ messages in thread
From: Wil Reichert @ 2002-12-12 0:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg KH; +Cc: kernel list
Ok, 2.5.51 plus dm patches result in the following:
Initializing LVM: device-mapper: device
/dev/ide/host2/bus1/target0/lun0/disc too small for target
device-mapper: internal error adding target to table
device-mapper: destroying table
device-mapper ioctl cmd 2 failed: Invalid argument
Couldn't load device 'cheese_vg-blah'.
0 logical volume(s) in volume group "cheese_vg" now active
lvm2.
Was fine (minus of course the entire bio thing) in 50, did something
break in 51 or is it just my box?
Wil
> > > Did you try the dm patches that were just posted to lkml today?
> >
> > Just subscribed today, missed 'em. You're refering to
> >
> >
>
http://people.sistina.com/~thornber/patches/2.5-stable/2.5.50/2.5.50-dm-2.tar.bz2
?
>
> Nope, try the ones at:
>
http://people.sistina.com/~thornber/patches/2.5-stable/2.5.51/
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
__________________________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now.
http://mailplus.yahoo.com
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* Re: "bio too big" error
2002-12-12 0:15 ` "bio too big" error Wil Reichert
@ 2002-12-12 9:12 ` Joe Thornber
2002-12-12 17:33 ` Wil Reichert
2002-12-12 21:51 ` Kevin Corry
0 siblings, 2 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: Joe Thornber @ 2002-12-12 9:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Wil Reichert; +Cc: Greg KH, kernel list
On Wed, Dec 11, 2002 at 04:15:42PM -0800, Wil Reichert wrote:
> Ok, 2.5.51 plus dm patches result in the following:
>
> Initializing LVM: device-mapper: device
> /dev/ide/host2/bus1/target0/lun0/disc too small for target
> device-mapper: internal error adding target to table
> device-mapper: destroying table
> device-mapper ioctl cmd 2 failed: Invalid argument
> Couldn't load device 'cheese_vg-blah'.
> 0 logical volume(s) in volume group "cheese_vg" now active
> lvm2.
>
> Was fine (minus of course the entire bio thing) in 50, did something
> break in 51 or is it just my box?
I've had a couple of reports of this problem. The offending patch is:
http://people.sistina.com/~thornber/patches/2.5-stable/2.5.51/2.5.51-dm-1/00005.patch
back it out if necc.
All it does is:
--- diff/drivers/md/dm-table.c 2002-12-11 11:59:51.000000000 +0000
+++ source/drivers/md/dm-table.c 2002-12-11 12:00:00.000000000 +0000
@@ -388,7 +388,7 @@
static int check_device_area(struct dm_dev *dd, sector_t start, sector_t len)
{
sector_t dev_size;
- dev_size = dd->bdev->bd_inode->i_size;
+ dev_size = dd->bdev->bd_inode->i_size >> SECTOR_SHIFT;
return ((start < dev_size) && (len <= (dev_size - start)));
}
ie. previously we were accidentally comparing bytes with sectors to
verify the device sizes. So either I'm being very stupid (likely) and
the above patch is bogus, or you really don't have room for this lv.
Can you send me 3 bits of information please:
1) disk/partition sizes for your PVs
2) an LVM2 backup of the metadata (the nice readable ascii one).
3) The version of LVM that *created* the lv.
Thanks,
- Joe
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread* Re: "bio too big" error
2002-12-12 9:12 ` Joe Thornber
@ 2002-12-12 17:33 ` Wil Reichert
2002-12-12 21:51 ` Kevin Corry
1 sibling, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: Wil Reichert @ 2002-12-12 17:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Joe Thornber; +Cc: kernel list
> ie. previously we were accidentally comparing bytes with sectors to
> verify the device sizes. So either I'm being very stupid (likely) and
> the above patch is bogus, or you really don't have room for this lv.
> Can you send me 3 bits of information please:
Well, it works fine w/ the 2.4 kernel & prior 2.5's, I think my lv is
fine...
> 1) disk/partition sizes for your PVs
spans 4 entire discs and one partition
Disk /dev/discs/disc4/disc: 80.0 GB, 80039116800 bytes
Disk /dev/discs/disc1/disc: 123.5 GB, 123522416640 bytes
Disk /dev/ide/host2/bus1/target0/lun0/disc: 100.0 GB, 100030242816 bytes
Disk /dev/ide/host2/bus0/target1/lun0/disc: 10.1 GB, 10110320640 bytes
/dev/discs/disc0/part4 40072 119150 39855816 8e Linux LVM
Dunno if it matters, but the 80G is 2 striped 40s on a 3ware controller,
the 120, 100, and 10 are on a Promise U133 card, and the 40 gig
partition is on the native VIA controller. Top it all of this is an SMP
box.
> 2) an LVM2 backup of the metadata (the nice readable ascii one).
/etc/lvm/backup/cheese_vg -
# Generated by LVM2: Tue Dec 10 21:11:37 2002
contents = "Text Format Volume Group"
version = 1
description = "Created *after* executing 'vgconvert -M2 cheese_vg'"
creation_host = "darwin" # Linux darwin 2.4.19 #1 SMP Wed Nov 13
16:54:28 EST 2002 i686
creation_time = 1039572697 # Tue Dec 10 21:11:37 2002
cheese_vg {
id = "WF3vAx-k1r3-NUjU-az7z-I4SM-oorx-rvoYSt"
seqno = 1
status = ["RESIZEABLE", "READ", "WRITE"]
system_id = "darwin1025684717"
extent_size = 32768 # 16 Megabytes
max_lv = 256
max_pv = 256
physical_volumes {
pv0 {
id = "XFexK7-KqnW-dt7I-JHfB-gC8t-8Z45-RLiCEW"
device = "/dev/discs/disc4/disc" # Hint
only
status = ["ALLOCATABLE"]
pe_start = 33152
pe_count = 4769 # 74.5156 Gigabytes
}
pv1 {
id = "7swUJv-wGiq-9uCz-xiKK-owvf-p77g-zGU1C5"
device = "/dev/discs/disc1/disc" # Hint
only
status = ["ALLOCATABLE"]
pe_start = 33152
pe_count = 7361 # 115.016 Gigabytes
}
pv2 {
id = "z1Zxq5-X1JX-q08r-epqS-T0V7-003q-admD5T"
device =
"/dev/ide/host2/bus1/target0/lun0/disc"# Hint only
status = ["ALLOCATABLE"]
pe_start = 33152
pe_count = 5961 # 93.1406 Gigabytes
}
pv3 {
id = "zfuSRQ-mYYI-pGHR-9Mu2-uFWu-JQiH-JZyO7I"
device = "/dev/discs/disc0/part4" # Hint
only
status = ["ALLOCATABLE"]
pe_start = 33152
pe_count = 2431 # 37.9844 Gigabytes
}
pv4 {
id = "TNYATl-VrjS-Dt4T-e906-Ilb3-bgu7-JQS1sb"
device =
"/dev/ide/host2/bus0/target1/lun0/disc"# Hint only
status = ["ALLOCATABLE"]
pe_start = 33152
pe_count = 601 # 9.39062 Gigabytes
}
}
logical_volumes {
blah {
id = "000000-0000-0000-0000-0000-0000-000000"
status = ["READ", "WRITE", "VISIBLE"]
allocation_policy = "next free"
read_ahead = 1024
segment_count = 7
segment1 {
start_extent = 0
extent_count = 4769 # 74.5156
Gigabytes
type = "striped"
stripe_count = 1 # linear
stripes = [
"pv0", 0
]
}
segment2 {
start_extent = 4769
extent_count = 1409 # 22.0156
Gigabytes
type = "striped"
stripe_count = 1 # linear
stripes = [
"pv2", 4552
]
}
segment3 {
start_extent = 6178
extent_count = 2255 # 35.2344
Gigabytes
type = "striped"
stripe_count = 1 # linear
stripes = [
"pv3", 0
]
}
segment4 {
start_extent = 8433
extent_count = 7361 # 115.016
Gigabytes
type = "striped"
stripe_count = 1 # linear
stripes = [
"pv1", 0
]
}
segment5 {
start_extent = 15794
extent_count = 4552 # 71.125
Gigabytes
type = "striped"
stripe_count = 1 # linear
stripes = [
"pv2", 0
]
}
segment6 {
start_extent = 20346
extent_count = 176 # 2.75 Gigabytes
type = "striped"
stripe_count = 1 # linear
stripes = [
"pv3", 2255
]
}
segment7 {
start_extent = 20522
extent_count = 601 # 9.39062
Gigabytes
type = "striped"
stripe_count = 1 # linear
stripes = [
"pv4", 0
]
}
}
}
}
> 3) The version of LVM that *created* the lv.
1.0.3, I **think**. I know it rev'd to 1.0.4 or 1.0.5 before I added
another disc or two. Upgraded to lvm2 a couple months back. Just
recently did a 'vgconvert -M2 cheese_vg' to see if that helped things,
but didn't seem to matter.
Wil
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread* Re: "bio too big" error
2002-12-12 9:12 ` Joe Thornber
2002-12-12 17:33 ` Wil Reichert
@ 2002-12-12 21:51 ` Kevin Corry
1 sibling, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: Kevin Corry @ 2002-12-12 21:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Joe Thornber, Wil Reichert; +Cc: Greg KH, kernel list, lvm-devel
On Thursday 12 December 2002 03:12, Joe Thornber wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 11, 2002 at 04:15:42PM -0800, Wil Reichert wrote:
> > Ok, 2.5.51 plus dm patches result in the following:
> >
> > Initializing LVM: device-mapper: device
> > /dev/ide/host2/bus1/target0/lun0/disc too small for target
> > device-mapper: internal error adding target to table
> > device-mapper: destroying table
> > device-mapper ioctl cmd 2 failed: Invalid argument
> > Couldn't load device 'cheese_vg-blah'.
> > 0 logical volume(s) in volume group "cheese_vg" now active
> > lvm2.
> >
> > Was fine (minus of course the entire bio thing) in 50, did something
> > break in 51 or is it just my box?
>
> I've had a couple of reports of this problem. The offending patch is:
>
> http://people.sistina.com/~thornber/patches/2.5-stable/2.5.51/2.5.51-dm-1/0
>0005.patch
>
> back it out if necc.
>
> All it does is:
>
> --- diff/drivers/md/dm-table.c 2002-12-11 11:59:51.000000000 +0000
> +++ source/drivers/md/dm-table.c 2002-12-11 12:00:00.000000000 +0000
> @@ -388,7 +388,7 @@
> static int check_device_area(struct dm_dev *dd, sector_t start, sector_t
> len) {
> sector_t dev_size;
> - dev_size = dd->bdev->bd_inode->i_size;
> + dev_size = dd->bdev->bd_inode->i_size >> SECTOR_SHIFT;
> return ((start < dev_size) && (len <= (dev_size - start)));
> }
Actually, this 00005.patch *is* necessary. dd->bdev->bd_inode->i_size *is* in
bytes, and does need to be shifted to do the above comparison.
I believe we have tracked the problem down to the call to dm_get_device() in
dm-linear.c. It is passing in an incorrect value, which winds up being the
"start" parameter to the check_device_area() function. I've included a patch
at the end of this email which I believe should fix the problem. I have also
checked dm-stripe.c, and it appears to make the call to dm_get_device()
correctly, so no worries there.
--
Kevin Corry
corryk@us.ibm.com
http://evms.sourceforge.net/
--- linux-2.5.51a/drivers/md/dm-linear.c 2002/11/20 20:09:22 1.1
+++ linux-2.5.51b/drivers/md/dm-linear.c 2002/12/12 21:38:32
@@ -43,7 +43,7 @@
goto bad;
}
- if (dm_get_device(ti, argv[0], ti->begin, ti->len,
+ if (dm_get_device(ti, argv[0], lc->start, ti->len,
dm_table_get_mode(ti->table), &lc->dev)) {
ti->error = "dm-linear: Device lookup failed";
goto bad;
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2002-12-12 22:30 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2002-12-11 2:17 "bio too big" error Wil Reichert
2002-12-11 2:44 ` Andrew Morton
2002-12-11 3:38 ` Wil Reichert
2002-12-11 5:11 ` Greg KH
2002-12-11 13:40 ` Wil Reichert
2002-12-11 19:16 ` Greg KH
2002-12-11 5:18 ` Andrew Morton
2002-12-11 12:09 ` Wil Reichert
2002-12-11 7:21 ` Jens Axboe
2002-12-12 9:22 ` Joe Thornber
2002-12-12 12:08 ` Joe Thornber
2002-12-12 18:34 ` Wil Reichert
2002-12-12 20:29 ` Joe Thornber
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2002-12-11 23:45 Confusing help texts? Greg KH
2002-12-12 0:15 ` "bio too big" error Wil Reichert
2002-12-12 9:12 ` Joe Thornber
2002-12-12 17:33 ` Wil Reichert
2002-12-12 21:51 ` Kevin Corry
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox