From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 12 Dec 2002 18:00:48 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 12 Dec 2002 18:00:48 -0500 Received: from dp.samba.org ([66.70.73.150]:7627 "EHLO lists.samba.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Thu, 12 Dec 2002 18:00:47 -0500 From: Rusty Russell To: Matt Reppert Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, wz6b@arrl.net Subject: Re: 2.5.50 Up and running but In-reply-to: Your message of "Thu, 12 Dec 2002 01:21:01 MDT." <20021212012101.238ae459.arashi@arashi.yi.org> Date: Fri, 13 Dec 2002 09:20:04 +1100 Message-Id: <20021212230836.B5D2D2C07C@lists.samba.org> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In message <20021212012101.238ae459.arashi@arashi.yi.org> you write: > On Wed, 11 Dec 2002 22:59:10 -0800 > Matt Young wrote: > > > Boot couldn't find the module dependency file, even though I did make modul es > > and make modules_install > > Yeah, the make rule for depmod got removed in one of the module merges. This > will put it back. (Untested, my init scripts run depmod so it's not a big dea l > for me.) Rusty, am I being stupid or is this okay now that depmod > works? Yep, that's fine: the original modprobe replacement didn't need modules.dep, but Adam Richter has 1300 modules and he complained about the speed (and provided the patch to modprobe to use modules.dep, so what could I say?) Hopefully when Linus comes back he'll take my patches, Rusty. -- Anyone who quotes me in their sig is an idiot. -- Rusty Russell.