From: Tracy R Reed <treed@ultraviolet.org>
To: Tupshin Harper <tupshin@tupshin.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: is KERNEL developement finished, yet ??? (ACLs)
Date: Sat, 14 Dec 2002 21:29:14 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20021214212914.A8682@ultraviolet.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3DEFB275.9000807@tupshin.com>; from tupshin@tupshin.com on Thu, Dec 05, 2002 at 12:09:25PM -0800
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 365 bytes --]
On Thu, Dec 05, 2002 at 12:09:25PM -0800, Tupshin Harper spake thusly:
> I'm not at all opposed to capabilities, but I don't believe they come
> close to obviating ACLs. It also doesn't seem ACLs and capabilities are
> in any kind of conflict. Why could we not have both?
SE Linux seems to give you both.
--
Tracy Reed http://www.ultraviolet.org
[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 240 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-12-15 5:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-12-05 2:00 is KERNEL developement finished, yet ??? Ed Vance
2002-12-05 12:24 ` Shane Helms
2002-12-05 12:54 ` Joseph D. Wagner
2002-12-05 13:15 ` Andreas Schwab
2002-12-05 18:07 ` Linus Torvalds
2002-12-05 19:52 ` Shane Helms
2002-12-05 20:03 ` Linus Torvalds
2002-12-05 20:09 ` is KERNEL developement finished, yet ??? (ACLs) Tupshin Harper
2002-12-06 10:38 ` Jakob Oestergaard
2002-12-15 5:29 ` Tracy R Reed [this message]
2002-12-07 20:34 ` is KERNEL developement finished, yet ??? Kai Henningsen
2002-12-05 18:09 ` Alan Cox
2002-12-05 17:47 ` yodaiken
2002-12-05 19:08 ` John Bradford
2002-12-06 6:15 ` Joseph D. Wagner
2002-12-06 6:30 ` John Alvord
2002-12-06 9:48 ` Alvaro Lopes
2002-12-07 20:43 ` Kai Henningsen
2002-12-07 20:39 ` Kai Henningsen
2002-12-09 14:08 ` Jesse Pollard
2002-12-10 0:26 ` H. Peter Anvin
2002-12-05 14:33 ` Mikael Pettersson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20021214212914.A8682@ultraviolet.org \
--to=treed@ultraviolet.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tupshin@tupshin.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox