linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Larry McVoy <lm@bitmover.com>
To: Alan Cox <alan@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Freezing.. (was Re: Intel P6 vs P7 system call performance)
Date: Wed, 18 Dec 2002 16:37:54 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20021218163754.A2555@work.bitmover.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200212190018.gBJ0Iir04816@devserv.devel.redhat.com>; from alan@redhat.com on Wed, Dec 18, 2002 at 07:18:44PM -0500

On Wed, Dec 18, 2002 at 07:18:44PM -0500, Alan Cox wrote:
> > > > I can understand it when we're discussing BK; other than that, it's pretty
> > > > friggin lame.  If that's what was behind your posts, Alan, there is an
> > > > easy procmail fix for that.
> > > 
> > > It wasnt me who brought up bitkeeper
> > 
> > PLONK.  Into kernel-spam you go.  I've had it with ax grinders.
> 
> Oh dear me. Larry McVoy has flipped
> 
> I'm now being added to his spam list for *not* mentioning bitkeeper
> 
> Poor Larry, I hope has a nice christmas break, he clearly needs it

Look, Alan and anyone else, I'm sort of sick of the flames about BK.
It's apparent that there will always be people who are looking for
excuses to attack BK because it isn't GPLed and how dare the kernel
hackers use it.  Your mail was so senseless that that was the only sane
explanation I could find and apparently I wasn't being paranoid, that's
what John thought as well.

I have a bad habit of taking things personally and too seriously and
the result is that attacks on me/BK/whatever, imagined or real, stress
me out and waste my time.  Life's too short to for me to deal with that
nonsense anymore.  I discovered procmail and I dump people into a spam
file if I feel they have a track record of yanking my chain.  It's my
fault that I'm such a wuss that I can't handle it but this works.
It's not personal, it's about having a more pleasant life and I find
things to be more pleasant without the flames.

I'll still read your mail, I do so about every 2 weeks, but that way 
whatever yankage you were (or were not) trying to do is in the past and
I'll ignore it.
-- 
---
Larry McVoy            	 lm at bitmover.com           http://www.bitmover.com/lm 

  reply	other threads:[~2002-12-19  0:30 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <20021218161506.M7976@work.bitmover.com>
2002-12-19  0:18 ` Freezing.. (was Re: Intel P6 vs P7 system call performance) Alan Cox
2002-12-19  0:37   ` Larry McVoy [this message]
2002-12-19  1:08 Adam J. Richter
2002-12-19  9:13 ` Russell King
2002-12-19 16:39   ` Eli Carter
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2002-12-18 22:00 Nakajima, Jun
2002-12-18 16:41 Intel P6 vs P7 system call performance Dave Jones
2002-12-18 16:49 ` Freezing.. (was Re: Intel P6 vs P7 system call performance) Linus Torvalds
2002-12-18 16:56   ` Larry McVoy
2002-12-18 16:58   ` Dave Jones
2002-12-18 17:41     ` Linus Torvalds
2002-12-18 18:03       ` Jeff Garzik
2002-12-18 18:09         ` Mike Dresser
2002-12-23 12:34           ` Kai Henningsen
2002-12-18 19:08       ` Alan Cox
2002-12-18 19:23         ` Larry McVoy
2002-12-18 19:30           ` Alan Cox
2002-12-18 19:33             ` Larry McVoy
2002-12-18 19:42               ` Alan Cox
2002-12-18 19:45                 ` Larry McVoy
2002-12-18 20:39                   ` John Bradford
2002-12-18 22:08                     ` Larry McVoy
2002-12-18 22:37                       ` John Bradford
2002-12-19  1:09                         ` Alan Cox
2002-12-19  0:37                           ` Russell King
2002-12-19  0:58                             ` Jeff Garzik
2002-12-19  1:43                             ` Martin J. Bligh
2002-12-19 10:50                             ` Dave Jones
2002-12-19  0:59                           ` John Bradford
2002-12-19 10:27                             ` Dave Jones
2002-12-19  1:17                           ` Linus Torvalds
2002-12-19  0:08                       ` Alan Cox
2002-12-19  0:53                         ` John Bradford
2002-12-19 13:17                       ` Stephen Satchell
2002-12-19  5:34         ` Timothy D. Witham
2002-12-19  6:43           ` Andrew Morton
2002-12-19  5:45             ` Timothy D. Witham
2002-12-19  7:05           ` Martin J. Bligh
2002-12-19  6:08             ` Timothy D. Witham
2002-12-18 19:50       ` Oliver Xymoron
2002-12-18 17:06   ` Eli Carter
2002-12-18 17:08   ` Andrew Morton
2002-12-18 18:25   ` John Alvord

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20021218163754.A2555@work.bitmover.com \
    --to=lm@bitmover.com \
    --cc=alan@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).