From: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@pobox.com>
To: Till Immanuel Patzschke <tip@inw.de>
Cc: lse-tech <lse-tech@lists.sourceforge.net>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: 15000+ processes -- poor performance ?!
Date: Wed, 18 Dec 2002 19:59:40 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20021219005940.GB10502@gtf.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3E0116D6.35CA202A@inw.de>
On Wed, Dec 18, 2002 at 04:46:15PM -0800, Till Immanuel Patzschke wrote:
> Dear List(s),
>
> as part of my project I need to run a very high number of processes/threads on a
> linux machine. Right now I have a Dual-PIII 1.4G w/ 8GB RAM -- I am running
> 4000 processes w/ 2-3 threads each totaling in a process count of 15000+
> processes (since Linux doesn't really distinguish between threads and
> processes...).
> Once I pass the 10000 (+/-) pocesses load increases drastically (on startup,
> although it returns to normal), however the system time (on one processor)
> reaches for 54% (12061 procs) while the only non sleeping process is top -- the
> system is basically doing nothing (except scheduling the "nothing" which
> consumes significant system time).
> Is there anything I can do to reduce that system load/time? (I haven't been
> able to exactly define the "line" but it definitly gets worse the more processes
> need to be handled.)
Redesign your program to not do silly things like this.
Unless you have hardware with 5000 or more CPUs...
Jeff
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-12-19 0:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-12-19 0:46 15000+ processes -- poor performance ?! Till Immanuel Patzschke
2002-12-19 0:47 ` [Lse-tech] " Martin J. Bligh
2002-12-19 0:53 ` Till Immanuel Patzschke
2002-12-19 1:15 ` William Lee Irwin III
2002-12-19 1:12 ` David Lang
2002-12-19 1:25 ` William Lee Irwin III
2002-12-19 1:20 ` David Lang
2002-12-19 1:36 ` William Lee Irwin III
2002-12-19 1:42 ` Robert Love
2002-12-19 1:44 ` David Lang
2002-12-19 2:05 ` [Lse-tech] " William Lee Irwin III
2002-12-19 15:05 ` Denis Vlasenko
2002-12-19 10:27 ` William Lee Irwin III
2002-12-19 10:37 ` Alex Tomas
2002-12-19 10:55 ` William Lee Irwin III
2002-12-19 15:24 ` Martin J. Bligh
2002-12-19 15:15 ` Denis Vlasenko
2002-12-19 1:24 ` William Lee Irwin III
2002-12-19 0:59 ` Jeff Garzik [this message]
2002-12-19 1:11 ` William Lee Irwin III
2002-12-19 14:59 ` Denis Vlasenko
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2002-12-19 1:04 Perez-Gonzalez, Inaky
2002-12-19 1:13 ` Robert Love
2002-12-19 2:31 ` Alan Cox
2002-12-19 1:58 ` Rik van Riel
2002-12-19 2:01 ` William Lee Irwin III
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20021219005940.GB10502@gtf.org \
--to=jgarzik@pobox.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lse-tech@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=tip@inw.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox