Re: 15000+ processes -- poor performance ?!

Robert Love
2002-12-19T01:35:08Z

On Wed, 2002-12-18 at 20:20, David Lang wrote:
> Ok, I wasn't sure of the cause, but I've seen this as far back as 2.2 I
> had a machine trying to run 2000 processes under 2.2 and 2.4.0 (after
> upping the 2.2 kernel limit) and top would cost me ~40% throughput on the
> machine (while claiming it was useing ~5% of the CPU)

Yah a lot of it is like William is saying... you just do not want to
read multiple files for each process in /proc when you have a kajillion
processes, and that is what top does. Over and over.

Work has gone into 2.5 to make this a lot better.. If you use threads
with NPTL in 2.5, a lot of this is resolved, since the sub-threads will
not show up in as /proc/#/ entries.

Robert Love