public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Marc-Christian Petersen <m.c.p@wolk-project.de>
To: Robert Love <rml@tech9.net>, Con Kolivas <conman@kolivas.net>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@digeo.com>,
	linux kernel mailing list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [BENCHMARK] scheduler tunables with contest - prio_bonus_ratio
Date: Fri, 20 Dec 2002 12:17:07 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200212201217.07097.m.c.p@wolk-project.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1040341995.2521.81.camel@phantasy>

On Friday 20 December 2002 00:53, Robert Love wrote:

Hi Robert,

> You would probably get the same effect or better by setting
> prio_bonus_ratio lower (or off).
> Setting it lower will also give less priority bonus/penalty and not
> reinsert the tasks so readily into the active array.
> Something like the attached patch may help...

> --- linux-2.5.52/kernel/sched.c	2002-12-19 18:47:53.000000000 -0500
> +++ linux/kernel/sched.c	2002-12-19 18:48:05.000000000 -0500
> @@ -66,8 +66,8 @@
>  int child_penalty = 95;
>  int parent_penalty = 100;
>  int exit_weight = 3;
> -int prio_bonus_ratio = 25;
> -int interactive_delta = 2;
> +int prio_bonus_ratio = 5;
> +int interactive_delta = 1;
>  int max_sleep_avg = 2 * HZ;
>  int starvation_limit = 2 * HZ;
FYI: These changes are a horrible slowdown of all apps while kernel 
compilation.

ciao, Marc

  parent reply	other threads:[~2002-12-20 11:10 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2002-12-19 21:50 [BENCHMARK] scheduler tunables with contest - prio_bonus_ratio Con Kolivas
2002-12-19 22:46 ` Robert Love
2002-12-19 23:18   ` Andrew Morton
2002-12-19 23:41     ` Robert Love
2002-12-20  0:02       ` Andrew Morton
2002-12-20  0:15         ` Robert Love
2002-12-20  0:22           ` Con Kolivas
2002-12-20  0:29             ` Robert Love
2002-12-20  0:27       ` Andrew Morton
2002-12-20  2:42         ` Robert Love
2002-12-20  2:48           ` Andrew Morton
2002-12-24 22:26       ` scott thomason
2002-12-25  7:29         ` Con Kolivas
2002-12-25 16:17           ` scott thomason
2002-12-26 15:01             ` scott thomason
2003-01-01  0:31       ` Impact of scheduler tunables on interactive response (was Re: [BENCHMARK] scheduler tunables with contest - prio_bonus_ratio) scott thomason
2003-01-01 16:05         ` Bill Davidsen
2003-01-01 17:15           ` scott thomason
2002-12-19 23:42     ` [BENCHMARK] scheduler tunables with contest - prio_bonus_ratio Con Kolivas
2002-12-19 23:53       ` Robert Love
2002-12-20  0:04         ` Con Kolivas
2002-12-20  0:16           ` Robert Love
2002-12-20 11:17         ` Marc-Christian Petersen [this message]
2002-12-20 17:54           ` Robert Love

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200212201217.07097.m.c.p@wolk-project.de \
    --to=m.c.p@wolk-project.de \
    --cc=akpm@digeo.com \
    --cc=conman@kolivas.net \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rml@tech9.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox