From: Con Kolivas <conman@kolivas.net>
To: Marc-Christian Petersen <m.c.p@wolk-project.de>,
linux kernel mailing list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [BENCHMARK] scheduler tunables with contest - exit_weight
Date: Tue, 24 Dec 2002 12:46:40 +1100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200212241246.44601.conman@kolivas.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200212230148.16806.m.c.p@wolk-project.de>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, 23 Dec 2002 11:49 am, Marc-Christian Petersen wrote:
> On Saturday 21 December 2002 22:18, Con Kolivas wrote:
>
> Hey Con,
>
> > osdl hardware, contest results, 2.5.52-mm2 with scheduler tunable - exit
> > weight (ew1= exit weight ==1 and so on)
>
> Can you please try another thing?
>
> kernel/sched.c
>
> /*
> * If the child was a (relative-) CPU hog then decrease
> * the sleep_avg of the parent as well.
> */
> if (p->sleep_avg < p->parent->sleep_avg)
> p->parent->sleep_avg = (p->parent->sleep_avg * exit_weight
> + p->sleep_avg) / (exit_weight + 1);
>
> Remove these please and run again.
Sure why not
noload:
Kernel [runs] Time CPU% Loads LCPU% Ratio
2.5.52-mm2 [7] 39.2 181 0 0 1.08
2552mm2noew [5] 39.6 180 0 0 1.09
cacherun:
Kernel [runs] Time CPU% Loads LCPU% Ratio
2.5.52-mm2 [7] 36.5 194 0 0 1.01
2552mm2noew [5] 36.5 194 0 0 1.01
process_load:
Kernel [runs] Time CPU% Loads LCPU% Ratio
2.5.52-mm2 [7] 46.5 152 8 41 1.28
2552mm2noew [5] 49.1 143 10 50 1.36
ctar_load:
Kernel [runs] Time CPU% Loads LCPU% Ratio
2.5.52-mm2 [7] 52.8 154 1 10 1.46
2552mm2noew [5] 57.7 160 1 10 1.59
xtar_load:
Kernel [runs] Time CPU% Loads LCPU% Ratio
2.5.52-mm2 [7] 76.1 124 1 8 2.10
2552mm2noew [5] 70.1 128 1 8 1.94
io_load:
Kernel [runs] Time CPU% Loads LCPU% Ratio
2.5.52-mm2 [7] 74.5 112 11 20 2.06
2552mm2noew [5] 67.3 117 8 17 1.86
io_other:
Kernel [runs] Time CPU% Loads LCPU% Ratio
2.5.52-mm2 [7] 59.9 134 6 18 1.65
2552mm2noew [5] 66.2 131 9 21 1.83
read_load:
Kernel [runs] Time CPU% Loads LCPU% Ratio
2.5.52-mm2 [7] 50.5 147 5 6 1.39
2552mm2noew [5] 50.2 149 5 6 1.39
list_load:
Kernel [runs] Time CPU% Loads LCPU% Ratio
2.5.52-mm2 [7] 43.7 167 0 9 1.21
2552mm2noew [5] 43.5 166 0 9 1.20
mem_load:
Kernel [runs] Time CPU% Loads LCPU% Ratio
2.5.52-mm2 [7] 66.0 141 39 3 1.82
2552mm2noew [5] 64.7 136 38 3 1.79
Con
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.0 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQE+B7yAF6dfvkL3i1gRAhjaAJ4r0rEcvy95o28bw7WoSBoe7ZfmAgCgpHJS
HFJaBj8sBtA1MyzK/7qptQg=
=N3fU
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-12-24 1:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-12-21 21:18 [BENCHMARK] scheduler tunables with contest - exit_weight Con Kolivas
2002-12-23 0:49 ` Marc-Christian Petersen
2002-12-24 1:46 ` Con Kolivas [this message]
2002-12-25 13:24 ` Denis Vlasenko
2002-12-25 9:38 ` Con Kolivas
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200212241246.44601.conman@kolivas.net \
--to=conman@kolivas.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=m.c.p@wolk-project.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox