From: John Bradford <john@grabjohn.com>
To: rmk@arm.linux.org.uk (Russell King)
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Want a random entropy source?
Date: Sat, 28 Dec 2002 17:15:46 +0000 (GMT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200212281715.gBSHFkf3001354@darkstar.example.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20021228164750.A5217@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> from "Russell King" at Dec 28, 2002 04:47:50 PM
> > I have never understood how a 16-bit DAC or ADC can have noise above
> > 96 dB. Surely _by definition_ a 16-bit DAC or ADC is one that does
> > not have noise above that level.
>
> You're assuming that the ADC input is coupled to a noiseless source.
> Most ADCs have a chunk of analogue circuitry just before them which
> is a nice source of noise.
>
> Not only will noise be picked up via disconnected inputs, but it will
> also be picked up via the power supply and ground connections to that
> analogue circuit. How much of that noise gets into the ADC input is
> dependent on the quality, design and physical layout of the analogue
> circuit.
Right... So basically it can be claimed to be a 16-bit ADC as long as
it is noiseless above 96 dB, when all of the inputs to the ADC are
correctly terminated directly at the ADC inputs.
I just think it's funny that loads of "16-bit" soundcards are
effectively only 12-bit soundcards :-). Especially as that's about
the noise-floor of good quality vinyl :-).
> (As a side note, it's interesting that (what used to be) Crystal
> Semiconductor published a large chunk of information on the layout of
> boards including the routing of power supplies for combined digital
> and analogue circuits (and ADCs fall into that category.))
Good idea - I'd be grateful if more manufacturers would supply a
datasheet at all :-).
John.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-12-28 17:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-12-27 16:16 two 2.5 modules bugs Mikael Pettersson
2002-12-27 23:24 ` Petr Vandrovec
2002-12-28 10:37 ` Rusty Russell
2002-12-28 15:40 ` Want a random entropy source? Stephen Satchell
2002-12-28 16:00 ` John Bradford
2002-12-28 16:38 ` Dr. David Alan Gilbert
2002-12-28 16:47 ` Russell King
2002-12-28 17:15 ` John Bradford [this message]
2002-12-28 20:28 ` Folkert van Heusden
2002-12-28 20:39 ` John Bradford
2002-12-28 20:53 ` Folkert van Heusden
2002-12-28 23:20 ` Stephen Satchell
2002-12-28 23:41 ` John Bradford
2002-12-28 20:27 ` Folkert van Heusden
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200212281715.gBSHFkf3001354@darkstar.example.net \
--to=john@grabjohn.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rmk@arm.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox