From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sun, 29 Dec 2002 18:35:21 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sun, 29 Dec 2002 18:35:20 -0500 Received: from holomorphy.com ([66.224.33.161]:55781 "EHLO holomorphy") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sun, 29 Dec 2002 18:35:19 -0500 Date: Sun, 29 Dec 2002 15:42:03 -0800 From: William Lee Irwin III To: "Martin J. Bligh" Cc: Christoph Hellwig , James Bottomley , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] remove CONFIG_X86_NUMA Message-ID: <20021229234203.GM9704@holomorphy.com> Mail-Followup-To: William Lee Irwin III , "Martin J. Bligh" , Christoph Hellwig , James Bottomley , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <200212292239.gBTMdPJ12407@localhost.localdomain> <20021229234051.A12535@lst.de> <78170000.1041202589@titus> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <78170000.1041202589@titus> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.25i Organization: The Domain of Holomorphy Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org At some point in the past, someone had their attribution removed from: >> I already wondered about that, but AFAIK a kernel with X86_NUMAQ set >> still boots on a PeeCee, so it's really an option, not a choice. On Sun, Dec 29, 2002 at 02:56:40PM -0800, Martin J. Bligh wrote: > Nope, it won't boot on a PC - you're probably thinking of Summit, > which should. I think Bill had a patch to move NUMA-Q already ... > want to publish that one? It's just moving the 2 config decls inside the choice/endchoice bracket, not worth bothering with if it's getting fixed anyway. Bill