* Re: [PATCH] remove CONFIG_X86_NUMA
@ 2002-12-29 22:39 James Bottomley
2002-12-29 22:40 ` Christoph Hellwig
0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: James Bottomley @ 2002-12-29 22:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: hch; +Cc: James.Bottomley, linux-kernel
> It's only used to hide two entries in arch/i386/Kconfig.
The patch looks good. If it's OK to get rid of X86_NUMA, could you also move
X86_NUMAQ under the subarch menu?
Thanks,
James
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] remove CONFIG_X86_NUMA
2002-12-29 22:39 [PATCH] remove CONFIG_X86_NUMA James Bottomley
@ 2002-12-29 22:40 ` Christoph Hellwig
2002-12-29 22:51 ` James Bottomley
2002-12-29 22:56 ` Martin J. Bligh
0 siblings, 2 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Christoph Hellwig @ 2002-12-29 22:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: James Bottomley; +Cc: hch, linux-kernel
On Sun, Dec 29, 2002 at 04:39:25PM -0600, James Bottomley wrote:
> > It's only used to hide two entries in arch/i386/Kconfig.
>
> The patch looks good. If it's OK to get rid of X86_NUMA, could you also move
> X86_NUMAQ under the subarch menu?
I already wondered about that, but AFAIK a kernel with X86_NUMAQ set
still boots on a PeeCee, so it's really an option, not a choice.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] remove CONFIG_X86_NUMA
2002-12-29 22:40 ` Christoph Hellwig
@ 2002-12-29 22:51 ` James Bottomley
2002-12-29 22:58 ` Christoph Hellwig
2002-12-29 22:56 ` Martin J. Bligh
1 sibling, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: James Bottomley @ 2002-12-29 22:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Christoph Hellwig, James Bottomley, linux-kernel
hch@lst.de said:
> I already wondered about that, but AFAIK a kernel with X86_NUMAQ set
> still boots on a PeeCee, so it's really an option, not a choice.
It alters the mflags-y and mcore-y variables in arch/i386/Makefile, so it's
one of the subarch choices and thus should really be under the menu options.
James
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] remove CONFIG_X86_NUMA
2002-12-29 22:51 ` James Bottomley
@ 2002-12-29 22:58 ` Christoph Hellwig
2002-12-29 23:06 ` James Bottomley
0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: Christoph Hellwig @ 2002-12-29 22:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: James Bottomley; +Cc: Christoph Hellwig, linux-kernel
On Sun, Dec 29, 2002 at 04:51:44PM -0600, James Bottomley wrote:
> hch@lst.de said:
> > I already wondered about that, but AFAIK a kernel with X86_NUMAQ set
> > still boots on a PeeCee, so it's really an option, not a choice.
>
> It alters the mflags-y and mcore-y variables in arch/i386/Makefile, so it's
> one of the subarch choices and thus should really be under the menu options.
Okay, does this patch look better?
--- 1.19/arch/i386/Kconfig Sat Dec 28 23:18:10 2002
+++ edited/arch/i386/Kconfig Sun Dec 29 23:10:14 2002
@@ -49,7 +49,7 @@
config VOYAGER
bool "NCR Voyager Architecture"
- ---help---
+ help
Voyager is a MCA based 32 way capable SMP architecture proprietary
to NCR Corp. Machine classes 345x/35xx/4100/51xx are voyager based.
@@ -58,9 +58,19 @@
If you do not specifically know you have a Voyager based machine,
say N here otherwise the kernel you build will not be bootable.
+config X86_NUMAQ
+ bool "IBM/Sequent NUMAQ"
+ help
+ This option is used for getting Linux to run on a (IBM/Sequent) NUMA
+ multiquad box. This changes the way that processors are bootstrapped,
+ and uses Clustered Logical APIC addressing mode instead of Flat Logical.
+ You will need a new lynxer.elf file to flash your firmware with - send
+ email to Martin.Bligh@us.ibm.com
+
# Visual Workstation support is utterly broken.
# If you want to see it working mail an VW540 to hch@infradead.org 8)
-#bool 'SGI Visual Workstation support' CONFIG_VISWS
+#config VISWS
+# bool "SGI Visual Workstation support"
endchoice
@@ -430,24 +440,8 @@
This is purely to save memory - each supported CPU adds
approximately eight kilobytes to the kernel image.
-config X86_NUMA
- bool "Multi-node NUMA system support"
- depends on SMP
-
-#Platform Choices
-config X86_NUMAQ
- bool "Multiquad (IBM/Sequent) NUMAQ support"
- depends on X86_NUMA
- help
- This option is used for getting Linux to run on a (IBM/Sequent) NUMA
- multiquad box. This changes the way that processors are bootstrapped,
- and uses Clustered Logical APIC addressing mode instead of Flat Logical.
- You will need a new lynxer.elf file to flash your firmware with - send
- email to Martin.Bligh@us.ibm.com
-
config X86_SUMMIT
bool "IBM x440 (Summit/EXA) support"
- depends on X86_NUMA
help
This option is needed for IBM systems that use the Summit/EXA chipset.
In particular, it is needed for the x440.
@@ -456,7 +450,7 @@
config CLUSTERED_APIC
bool
- depends on X86_NUMA && (X86_NUMAQ || X86_SUMMIT)
+ depends on X86_NUMAQ || X86_SUMMIT
default y
# Common NUMA Features
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] remove CONFIG_X86_NUMA
2002-12-29 22:40 ` Christoph Hellwig
2002-12-29 22:51 ` James Bottomley
@ 2002-12-29 22:56 ` Martin J. Bligh
2002-12-29 23:42 ` William Lee Irwin III
1 sibling, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: Martin J. Bligh @ 2002-12-29 22:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Christoph Hellwig, James Bottomley, Bill Irwin; +Cc: linux-kernel
>> > It's only used to hide two entries in arch/i386/Kconfig.
>>
>> The patch looks good. If it's OK to get rid of X86_NUMA, could you also
>> move X86_NUMAQ under the subarch menu?
>
> I already wondered about that, but AFAIK a kernel with X86_NUMAQ set
> still boots on a PeeCee, so it's really an option, not a choice.
Nope, it won't boot on a PC - you're probably thinking of Summit,
which should. I think Bill had a patch to move NUMA-Q already ...
want to publish that one?
M.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] remove CONFIG_X86_NUMA
2002-12-29 22:56 ` Martin J. Bligh
@ 2002-12-29 23:42 ` William Lee Irwin III
0 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: William Lee Irwin III @ 2002-12-29 23:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Martin J. Bligh; +Cc: Christoph Hellwig, James Bottomley, linux-kernel
At some point in the past, someone had their attribution removed from:
>> I already wondered about that, but AFAIK a kernel with X86_NUMAQ set
>> still boots on a PeeCee, so it's really an option, not a choice.
On Sun, Dec 29, 2002 at 02:56:40PM -0800, Martin J. Bligh wrote:
> Nope, it won't boot on a PC - you're probably thinking of Summit,
> which should. I think Bill had a patch to move NUMA-Q already ...
> want to publish that one?
It's just moving the 2 config decls inside the choice/endchoice bracket,
not worth bothering with if it's getting fixed anyway.
Bill
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] remove CONFIG_X86_NUMA
@ 2002-12-29 22:04 Christoph Hellwig
0 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Christoph Hellwig @ 2002-12-29 22:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: torvalds; +Cc: linux-kernel
It's only used to hide two entries in arch/i386/Kconfig.
ACKed my mbligh.
--- 1.14/arch/i386/Kconfig Tue Dec 17 19:50:36 2002
+++ edited/arch/i386/Kconfig Sat Dec 21 18:10:12 2002
@@ -385,14 +385,8 @@
This is purely to save memory - each supported CPU adds
approximately eight kilobytes to the kernel image.
-config X86_NUMA
- bool "Multi-node NUMA system support"
- depends on SMP
-
-#Platform Choices
config X86_NUMAQ
bool "Multiquad (IBM/Sequent) NUMAQ support"
- depends on X86_NUMA
help
This option is used for getting Linux to run on a (IBM/Sequent) NUMA
multiquad box. This changes the way that processors are bootstrapped,
@@ -402,7 +396,6 @@
config X86_SUMMIT
bool "IBM x440 (Summit/EXA) support"
- depends on X86_NUMA
help
This option is needed for IBM systems that use the Summit/EXA chipset.
In particular, it is needed for the x440.
@@ -411,7 +404,7 @@
config CLUSTERED_APIC
bool
- depends on X86_NUMA && (X86_NUMAQ || X86_SUMMIT)
+ depends on X86_NUMAQ || X86_SUMMIT
default y
# Common NUMA Features
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2002-12-29 23:35 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2002-12-29 22:39 [PATCH] remove CONFIG_X86_NUMA James Bottomley
2002-12-29 22:40 ` Christoph Hellwig
2002-12-29 22:51 ` James Bottomley
2002-12-29 22:58 ` Christoph Hellwig
2002-12-29 23:06 ` James Bottomley
2002-12-29 22:56 ` Martin J. Bligh
2002-12-29 23:42 ` William Lee Irwin III
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2002-12-29 22:04 Christoph Hellwig
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox