public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: John Bradford <john@grabjohn.com>
To: profmakx@profmakx.org (Markus Pfeiffer)
Cc: sam@ravnborg.org, lm@work.bitmover.com, mail@hannes-reinecke.de,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Sparc port still maintained in 2.5
Date: Mon, 30 Dec 2002 18:27:42 +0000 (GMT)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200212301827.gBUIRgPH002681@darkstar.example.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200212301913.28503.profmakx@profmakx.org> from "Markus Pfeiffer" at Dec 30, 2002 07:13:23 PM

> > > I have a spare Alpha box (in theory I made need it some day if we ever
> > > decide to support Tru64 but that seems like a small market).  I don't
> > > know how useful it is but I could put it up outside our firewall if
> > > that helped.  I'd have to install Linux on it and I'm booked up until
> > > Jan 9th but if you still need it then let me know.
> >
> > Hi Larry, nice offer. But I personally would not have time hacking on
> > Alpha. Others may find it usefull though.
> >
> 
> Well, I have an Alpha System here myself and am also "hacking" on
> it. But one has also to ask oneself if there is any demand (apart
> from my personal demand) for a maintained Linux/Alpha >= 2.5...

I'm certainly going to be interested in Linux/Sparc >= 2.5 when I can
get a Sparc machine, (I'm hoping to help work on the 'Splack'
distribution, which is basically an un-official Slackware-like
distribution for Sparcs), with the eventual aim of moving from X86 to
Sparc as my default architechture, but I'm not really interested in
Alpha.

What's the status of the 2.5 Sparc tree?

John.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2002-12-30 18:20 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2002-12-30 15:07 Alpha port still maintained in 2.5 Hannes Reinecke
2002-12-30 15:15 ` Sam Ravnborg
2002-12-30 15:23   ` Larry McVoy
2002-12-30 16:50     ` Sam Ravnborg
2002-12-30 18:13       ` Markus Pfeiffer
2002-12-30 18:16         ` William Lee Irwin III
2002-12-30 18:20         ` Jochen Friedrich
2002-12-30 18:52           ` Larry McVoy
2002-12-30 19:37           ` Hannes Reinecke
2002-12-30 18:27         ` John Bradford [this message]
2002-12-30 18:43           ` Sparc " Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2002-12-30 18:48 Holzrichter, Bruce

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200212301827.gBUIRgPH002681@darkstar.example.net \
    --to=john@grabjohn.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lm@work.bitmover.com \
    --cc=mail@hannes-reinecke.de \
    --cc=profmakx@profmakx.org \
    --cc=sam@ravnborg.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox