* Usermode NFS - still in existence ?
@ 2002-12-31 22:13 Josh Brooks
2002-12-31 23:37 ` Matthias Schniedermeyer
2003-01-01 20:25 ` Alan Cox
0 siblings, 2 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Josh Brooks @ 2002-12-31 22:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-kernel
Hello,
I have a system running a vendor supplied kernel that I do not have the
ability to change. Further, it is modified enough that normal modules
will not load into it - and of course I cannot compile modules to work
with it since I don't have the source to the kernel.
And for some reason they did not compile NFS in.
And I need this system to be an NFS _client_.
What are my options ? I see that at some point there was a usermode NFS
... does this still exist ? Is there some other way of mounting an NFS
volume from userland - really any solution is fine, I just need to mount
my nfs volume from this server.
thanks!
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: Usermode NFS - still in existence ?
2002-12-31 22:13 Usermode NFS - still in existence ? Josh Brooks
@ 2002-12-31 23:37 ` Matthias Schniedermeyer
2003-01-01 20:25 ` Alan Cox
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Matthias Schniedermeyer @ 2002-12-31 23:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Josh Brooks; +Cc: linux-kernel
On Tue, Dec 31, 2002 at 02:13:58PM -0800, Josh Brooks wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I have a system running a vendor supplied kernel that I do not have the
> ability to change. Further, it is modified enough that normal modules
> will not load into it - and of course I cannot compile modules to work
> with it since I don't have the source to the kernel.
>
> And for some reason they did not compile NFS in.
>
> And I need this system to be an NFS _client_.
>
> What are my options ? I see that at some point there was a usermode NFS
> ... does this still exist ? Is there some other way of mounting an NFS
> volume from userland - really any solution is fine, I just need to mount
> my nfs volume from this server.
Hmmm.
uname -r tells you the base-kernel and what you have to write into
"EXTRAVERSION".
uname -v tells you if you have a SMP or UP-Kernel.
Then you "guess" what CPU-Type was used.
A start-point for this guess is "uname -m".
For a non-specific kernel i would guess i386 (=i386) or Pentium (=i586).
For i686 you can normaly use the CPU from "/proc/cpuinfo".
This way you SHOULD be able to create a module that matches (more or
less) for the kernel you want to load it in.
At least i had luck with this method so far. :-)
Bis denn
--
Real Programmers consider "what you see is what you get" to be just as
bad a concept in Text Editors as it is in women. No, the Real Programmer
wants a "you asked for it, you got it" text editor -- complicated,
cryptic, powerful, unforgiving, dangerous.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: Usermode NFS - still in existence ?
2002-12-31 22:13 Usermode NFS - still in existence ? Josh Brooks
2002-12-31 23:37 ` Matthias Schniedermeyer
@ 2003-01-01 20:25 ` Alan Cox
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Alan Cox @ 2003-01-01 20:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Josh Brooks; +Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List
On Tue, 2002-12-31 at 22:13, Josh Brooks wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I have a system running a vendor supplied kernel that I do not have the
> ability to change. Further, it is modified enough that normal modules
> will not load into it - and of course I cannot compile modules to work
> with it since I don't have the source to the kernel.
Ask the vendor for the source. You are entitled to the GPL kernel source
under the GPL license.
Alan
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2003-01-01 19:34 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2002-12-31 22:13 Usermode NFS - still in existence ? Josh Brooks
2002-12-31 23:37 ` Matthias Schniedermeyer
2003-01-01 20:25 ` Alan Cox
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).