From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 1 Jan 2003 21:13:49 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 1 Jan 2003 21:13:49 -0500 Received: from nat-pool-rdu.redhat.com ([66.187.233.200]:29821 "EHLO devserv.devel.redhat.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Wed, 1 Jan 2003 21:13:48 -0500 Date: Wed, 1 Jan 2003 21:22:15 -0500 From: Pete Zaitcev To: Tomas Szepe Cc: lkml , sparclinux@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: sparc32 net devices Message-ID: <20030101212215.B1006@devserv.devel.redhat.com> References: <20030101204954.GD17053@louise.pinerecords.com> <20030101155849.A20852@devserv.devel.redhat.com> <20030101215949.GG17053@louise.pinerecords.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i In-Reply-To: <20030101215949.GG17053@louise.pinerecords.com>; from szepe@pinerecords.com on Wed, Jan 01, 2003 at 10:59:49PM +0100 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > Date: Wed, 1 Jan 2003 22:59:49 +0100 > From: Tomas Szepe > Here's a first stab then. No need to include sbus devices > in drivers/net/Kconfig, they're all there already. Unfortunately > this has to tune a lot of drivers' bus dependencies, I'm quite sure > I've missed some. > config NET_VENDOR_SMC > bool "Western Digital/SMC cards" > - depends on NET_ETHERNET > + depends on NET_ETHERNET && (ISA || MCA || EISA) > help > If you have a network (Ethernet) card belonging to this class, say Y Looks ok with me. If Dave or Jeff take it for common drivers/net/, I'm taking arch/sparc part. Thanks. I trust you tried at least to compile the result :) -- Pete