From: "David S. Miller" <davem@redhat.com>
To: alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk
Cc: lm@bitmover.com, tom@rhadamanthys.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] TCP Zero Copy for mmapped files
Date: Thu, 02 Jan 2003 15:16:00 -0800 (PST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20030102.151600.129375771.davem@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1041549644.24829.66.camel@irongate.swansea.linux.org.uk>
From: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Date: 02 Jan 2003 23:20:44 +0000
On Thu, 2003-01-02 at 22:28, Larry McVoy wrote:
> The VM cost hurts. Badly. Imagine that the network costs ZERO. Then
> the map/unmap/vm ops become the dominating term. That's why it is a
> fruitless approach, it still has a practical limit which is too low.
It depends how predictable your content is. With a 64bit box and a porn
server its probably quite tidy
Let's say you have infinite VM (which is what 64-bit almost is :) then
the cost is setting up all of these useless VMAs for each and every
file (which is a 1 time cost, ok), and also the VMA lookup each
write() call.
With sendfile() all of this goes straight to the page cache directly
without a VMA lookup.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-01-02 23:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-12-30 1:09 [PATCH] TCP Zero Copy for mmapped files Thomas Ogrisegg
2002-12-30 1:29 ` Larry McVoy
2003-01-02 6:37 ` David S. Miller
2003-01-02 22:12 ` Thomas Ogrisegg
2003-01-02 22:28 ` Larry McVoy
2003-01-02 23:20 ` Alan Cox
2003-01-02 23:16 ` David S. Miller [this message]
2003-01-03 0:56 ` Alan Cox
2003-01-03 2:40 ` David S. Miller
2003-01-03 2:41 ` Linus Torvalds
2003-01-02 23:13 ` David S. Miller
2003-01-03 0:45 ` Thomas Ogrisegg
2003-01-03 1:01 ` Larry McVoy
2003-01-03 1:59 ` Alan Cox
2003-01-06 14:36 ` Gianni Tedesco
2003-01-06 23:29 ` David S. Miller
2003-01-03 1:56 ` Alan Cox
2003-01-03 1:27 ` Larry McVoy
2003-01-03 2:42 ` David S. Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20030102.151600.129375771.davem@redhat.com \
--to=davem@redhat.com \
--cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lm@bitmover.com \
--cc=tom@rhadamanthys.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox