From: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
To: "David S. Miller" <davem@redhat.com>
Cc: rusty@rustcorp.com.au, torvalds@transmeta.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, schwidefsky@de.ibm.com, ak@suse.de,
paulus@samba.org, rmk@arm.linux.org.uk
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Modules 3/3: Sort sections
Date: Thu, 02 Jan 2003 21:35:54 +1100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20030102104053.ABF0C2C0FD@lists.samba.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Wed, 01 Jan 2003 21:15:36 -0800." <20030101.211536.121172392.davem@redhat.com>
In message <20030101.211536.121172392.davem@redhat.com> you write:
> From: Richard Henderson <rth@twiddle.net>
> Date: Wed, 1 Jan 2003 20:58:36 -0800
>
> On Wed, Jan 01, 2003 at 08:50:03PM -0800, David S. Miller wrote:
> > I think this is to get .foo.init sections.
>
> Obviously. Perhaps the question was worded badly. Instead read
> it as "Why don't we force this to be called .init.foo instead?"
>
> This new naming order was created recently, but I forget the reason.
> It used to be .init.foo
No, it used to be .foo.init, but -ffunction-sections calls its
functions <funcname>.init, so it was changed to .init.foo.
Of course, the simpler prefix test should now be sufficient.
Rusty.
--
Anyone who quotes me in their sig is an idiot. -- Rusty Russell.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-01-02 10:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-01-02 3:00 [PATCH] Modules 3/3: Sort sections Rusty Russell
2003-01-02 4:54 ` Richard Henderson
2003-01-02 4:50 ` David S. Miller
2003-01-02 4:58 ` Richard Henderson
2003-01-02 5:15 ` David S. Miller
2003-01-02 10:35 ` Rusty Russell [this message]
2003-01-02 17:39 ` Alan Cox
2003-01-02 9:36 ` Arjan van de Ven
2003-01-02 9:37 ` Richard Henderson
2003-01-02 10:48 ` Rusty Russell
2003-01-06 9:25 ` Miles Bader
2003-01-06 10:17 ` Rusty Russell
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20030102104053.ABF0C2C0FD@lists.samba.org \
--to=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
--cc=ak@suse.de \
--cc=davem@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=paulus@samba.org \
--cc=rmk@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=schwidefsky@de.ibm.com \
--cc=torvalds@transmeta.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox