From: Dominik Brodowski <linux@brodo.de>
To: torvalds@transmeta.com
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, cpufreq@www.linux.org.uk
Subject: [PATCH 2.5.54] cpufreq: p4-clockmod bugfixes
Date: Thu, 2 Jan 2003 22:43:33 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20030102214333.GD19479@brodo.de> (raw)
The "get current state" algorithm wasn't aware of the disable/enable bit,
and the policy verification function wasn't aware of the N44 / O17 bug.
Also, some unused code is removed.
Dominik
diff -ruN linux-original/arch/i386/kernel/cpu/cpufreq/p4-clockmod.c linux/arch/i386/kernel/cpu/cpufreq/p4-clockmod.c
--- linux-original/arch/i386/kernel/cpu/cpufreq/p4-clockmod.c 2003-01-02 20:56:45.000000000 +0100
+++ linux/arch/i386/kernel/cpu/cpufreq/p4-clockmod.c 2003-01-02 20:58:34.000000000 +0100
@@ -82,12 +82,17 @@
/* get current state */
rdmsr(MSR_IA32_THERM_CONTROL, l, h);
- l = l >> 1;
- l &= 0x7;
-
+ if (l & 0x10) {
+ l = l >> 1;
+ l &= 0x7;
+ } else
+ l = DC_DISABLE;
+
if (l == newstate) {
set_cpus_allowed(current, cpus_allowed);
return 0;
+ } else if (l == DC_RESV) {
+ printk(KERN_ERR PFX "BIG FAT WARNING: currently in invalid setting\n");
}
/* notifiers */
@@ -141,13 +146,18 @@
unsigned int i;
unsigned int newstate = 0;
unsigned int number_states = 0;
+ unsigned int minstate = 1;
- if (!cpufreq_p4_driver || !stock_freq || !policy)
+ if (!cpufreq_p4_driver || !stock_freq ||
+ !policy || !cpu_online(policy->cpu))
return -EINVAL;
+ if (has_N44_O17_errata)
+ minstate = 3;
+
if (policy->policy == CPUFREQ_POLICY_POWERSAVE)
{
- for (i=8; i>0; i--)
+ for (i=8; i>=minstate; i--)
if ((policy->min <= ((stock_freq / 8) * i)) &&
(policy->max >= ((stock_freq / 8) * i)))
{
@@ -155,7 +165,7 @@
number_states++;
}
} else {
- for (i=1; i<=8; i++)
+ for (i=minstate; i<=8; i++)
if ((policy->min <= ((stock_freq / 8) * i)) &&
(policy->max >= ((stock_freq / 8) * i)))
{
@@ -164,25 +174,8 @@
}
}
- /* if (number_states == 1) */
- {
- if (policy->cpu == CPUFREQ_ALL_CPUS) {
- for (i=0; i<NR_CPUS; i++)
- if (cpu_online(i))
- cpufreq_p4_setdc(i, newstate);
- } else {
- cpufreq_p4_setdc(policy->cpu, newstate);
- }
- }
- /* else {
- if (policy->policy == CPUFREQ_POLICY_POWERSAVE) {
- min_state = newstate;
- max_state = newstate + (number_states - 1);
- } else {
- max_state = newstate;
- min_state = newstate - (number_states - 1);
- }
- } */
+ cpufreq_p4_setdc(policy->cpu, newstate);
+
return 0;
}
@@ -190,17 +183,21 @@
static int cpufreq_p4_verify(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
{
unsigned int number_states = 0;
- unsigned int i;
+ unsigned int i = 1;
- if (!cpufreq_p4_driver || !stock_freq || !policy)
+ if (!cpufreq_p4_driver || !stock_freq ||
+ !policy || !cpu_online(policy->cpu))
return -EINVAL;
- if (!cpu_online(policy->cpu))
- policy->cpu = CPUFREQ_ALL_CPUS;
- cpufreq_verify_within_limits(policy, (stock_freq / 8), stock_freq);
+ cpufreq_verify_within_limits(policy,
+ policy->cpuinfo.min_freq,
+ policy->cpuinfo.max_freq);
+
+ if (has_N44_O17_errata)
+ i = 3;
- /* is there at least one state within limit? */
- for (i=1; i<=8; i++)
+ /* is there at least one state within the limit? */
+ for (; i<=8; i++)
if ((policy->min <= ((stock_freq / 8) * i)) &&
(policy->max >= ((stock_freq / 8) * i)))
number_states++;
@@ -209,6 +206,9 @@
return 0;
policy->max = (stock_freq / 8) * (((unsigned int) ((policy->max * 8) / stock_freq)) + 1);
+ cpufreq_verify_within_limits(policy,
+ policy->cpuinfo.min_freq,
+ policy->cpuinfo.max_freq);
return 0;
}
@@ -292,13 +292,14 @@
void __exit cpufreq_p4_exit(void)
{
- u32 l, h;
+ unsigned int i;
if (cpufreq_p4_driver) {
+ for (i=0; i<NR_CPUS; i++) {
+ if (cpu_online(i))
+ cpufreq_p4_setdc(i, DC_DISABLE);
+ }
cpufreq_unregister();
- /* return back to a non modulated state */
- rdmsr(MSR_IA32_THERM_CONTROL, l, h);
- wrmsr(MSR_IA32_THERM_CONTROL, l & ~(1<<4), h);
kfree(cpufreq_p4_driver);
}
}
next reply other threads:[~2003-01-02 21:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-01-02 21:43 Dominik Brodowski [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-01-06 13:49 [PATCH 2.5.54] cpufreq: p4-clockmod bugfixes Dominik Brodowski
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20030102214333.GD19479@brodo.de \
--to=linux@brodo.de \
--cc=cpufreq@www.linux.org.uk \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@transmeta.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox