From: Dominik Brodowski <linux@brodo.de>
To: torvalds@transmeta.com, andrew.grover@intel.com
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, cpufreq@www.linux.org.uk,
acpi-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: [PATCH 2.5.54] cpufreq: remove deprecated usage of CPUFREQ_ALL_CPUS in ACPI
Date: Thu, 2 Jan 2003 22:44:52 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20030102214452.GF19479@brodo.de> (raw)
As policy->cpu now only points to an existing CPU, some code can
safely be removed from the ACPI P-States cpufreq driver.
Dominik
diff -ruN linux-original/drivers/acpi/processor.c linux/drivers/acpi/processor.c
--- linux-original/drivers/acpi/processor.c 2003-01-02 20:56:57.000000000 +0100
+++ linux/drivers/acpi/processor.c 2003-01-02 21:17:34.000000000 +0100
@@ -1669,24 +1669,10 @@
if (!policy)
return_VALUE(-EINVAL);
- /* get a present, initialized CPU */
- if (policy->cpu == CPUFREQ_ALL_CPUS)
- {
- for (i=0; i<NR_CPUS; i++) {
- if (processors[i] != NULL) {
- cpu = i;
- pr = processors[cpu];
- break;
- }
- }
- }
- else
- {
- cpu = policy->cpu;
- pr = processors[cpu];
- if (!pr)
- return_VALUE(-EINVAL);
- }
+ cpu = policy->cpu;
+ pr = processors[cpu];
+ if (!pr)
+ return_VALUE(-EINVAL);
/* select appropriate P-State */
if (policy->policy == CPUFREQ_POLICY_POWERSAVE)
@@ -1715,19 +1701,9 @@
}
/* set one or all CPUs to the new state */
- if (policy->cpu == CPUFREQ_ALL_CPUS) {
- for (i=0; i<NR_CPUS; i++)
- {
- pr = processors[cpu];
- if (!pr || !cpu_online(cpu))
- continue;
- result = acpi_processor_set_performance (pr, next_state);
- }
- } else {
- result = acpi_processor_set_performance (pr, next_state);
- }
+ result = acpi_processor_set_performance (pr, next_state);
- return_VALUE(0);
+ return_VALUE(result);
}
@@ -1746,24 +1722,10 @@
if (!policy)
return_VALUE(-EINVAL);
- /* get a present, initialized CPU */
- if (policy->cpu == CPUFREQ_ALL_CPUS)
- {
- for (i=0; i<NR_CPUS; i++) {
- if (processors[i] != NULL) {
- cpu = i;
- pr = processors[cpu];
- break;
- }
- }
- }
- else
- {
- cpu = policy->cpu;
- pr = processors[cpu];
- if (!pr)
- return_VALUE(-EINVAL);
- }
+ cpu = policy->cpu;
+ pr = processors[cpu];
+ if (!pr)
+ return_VALUE(-EINVAL);
/* first check if min and max are within valid limits */
cpufreq_verify_within_limits(
@@ -1787,6 +1749,11 @@
policy->max = pr->performance.states[next_larger_state].core_frequency * 1000;
}
+ cpufreq_verify_within_limits(
+ policy,
+ pr->performance.states[pr->performance.state_count - 1].core_frequency * 1000,
+ pr->performance.states[pr->limit.state.px].core_frequency * 1000);
+
return_VALUE(0);
}
reply other threads:[~2003-01-02 21:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20030102214452.GF19479@brodo.de \
--to=linux@brodo.de \
--cc=acpi-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=andrew.grover@intel.com \
--cc=cpufreq@www.linux.org.uk \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@transmeta.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox