public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>
To: Jochen Friedrich <jochen@scram.de>
Cc: Matthias Andree <matthias.andree@gmx.de>,
	Linux-Kernel mailing list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Andreas Dilger <adilger@turbolabs.com>,
	Larry McVoy <lm@bitmover.com>
Subject: Re: Documentation/BK-usage/bksend problems?
Date: Sun, 5 Jan 2003 08:58:42 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20030105075842.GA1256@mars.ravnborg.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0301050839340.19683-100000@gfrw1044.bocc.de>

On Sun, Jan 05, 2003 at 08:42:59AM +0100, Jochen Friedrich wrote:
> Hi Matthias,
> 
> > The changes are fine, for 1.838 and 1.839, but the patch itself only
> > contains the effects of 1.839. The attached gzip_uu wrapped bk
> > "receive"able stuff is fine again and contains both ChangeSets.
> >
> > It seems as though it would take "diff 1.839 against 1.838" for bk gnupatch
> > and "changesets 1.838 to 1.839 inclusively" for bk send.
> 
> I noticed the same when sending my Token Ring updates. Here i tried to
> send 4 changesets and only the second one ended up in the patch while the
> bk send part was OK. This was on Alpha, so i don't think it's arch
> dependent.

I have seen something similar.

bk export -tpatch -r1.984..1.985
only exports cset 1.985

bk export -tpatch -r1.984
exports cset 1.984 as expected.

bk export -tpatch -r1.983..1.985
will export cset 1.984+1.985.

BK Version:
BitKeeper version is bk-3.0 20021011025136 for x86-glibc22-linux
Built by: lm@redhat71.bitmover.com in /build/bk-3.0-lm/src
Built on: Thu Oct 10 20:33:13 PDT 2002

I will submit this with bk sendbug now.

	Sam

  reply	other threads:[~2003-01-05  7:50 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-01-05  1:54 Documentation/BK-usage/bksend problems? Matthias Andree
2003-01-05  7:42 ` Jochen Friedrich
2003-01-05  7:58   ` Sam Ravnborg [this message]
2003-01-05 12:00     ` Matthias Andree
2003-01-05 14:55       ` Larry McVoy

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20030105075842.GA1256@mars.ravnborg.org \
    --to=sam@ravnborg.org \
    --cc=adilger@turbolabs.com \
    --cc=jochen@scram.de \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lm@bitmover.com \
    --cc=matthias.andree@gmx.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox