From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sun, 5 Jan 2003 19:39:55 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sun, 5 Jan 2003 19:39:55 -0500 Received: from roc-24-93-20-125.rochester.rr.com ([24.93.20.125]:57584 "EHLO www.kroptech.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sun, 5 Jan 2003 19:39:55 -0500 Date: Sun, 5 Jan 2003 19:48:16 -0500 From: Adam Kropelin To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, orinoco-users@lists.sourceforge.net, dhinds@sonic.net Subject: Re: [Orinoco-users] [PATCH] orinoco_plx-0.13b backport to kernel 2.2 Message-ID: <20030106004816.GA25837@www.kroptech.com> References: <20030105231921.GA7294@www.kroptech.com> <20030106000929.GC18808@zax.zax> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20030106000929.GC18808@zax.zax> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Jan 06, 2003 at 11:09:29AM +1100, David Gibson wrote: > On Sun, Jan 05, 2003 at 06:19:21PM -0500, Adam Kropelin wrote: > > working well. I've updated it to the latest (testing, beta) version of > > the orinoco_plx driver (0.13b) and the latest version of pcmcia-cs (3.2.3). > > Eck... be aware that the "testing" version, although labelled 0.13b > may not be the final 0.13b version. Yup, understood. I'll update the backport as necessary. Just wanted to start from the most recent code base available, even if it's still in flux. I would have gone with 0.13a but a couple bugfixes in 0.13b seemed worth having. --Adam