From: Andi Kleen <ak@muc.de>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@transmeta.com>
Cc: Andi Kleen <ak@muc.de>, "David S. Miller" <davem@redhat.com>,
andrew.morton@digeo.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Mikael Pettersson <mikpe@csd.uu.se>
Subject: Re: [BENCHMARK] Lmbench 2.5.54-mm2 (impressive improvements)
Date: Mon, 6 Jan 2003 03:05:42 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20030106020542.GA5615@averell> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0301051720420.13313-100000@home.transmeta.com>
On Mon, Jan 06, 2003 at 02:33:28AM +0100, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> > I can think of some things to speed it up more. e.g. replace all the
> > push / pop in SAVE/RESTORE_ALL with sub $frame,%esp ; movl %reg,offset(%esp)
> > and movl offset(%esp),%reg ; addl $frame,%esp. This way the CPU has
> > no dependencies between all the load/store options unlike push/pop.
>
> Last I remember, that only made a difference on Athlons, and Intel CPU's
I didn't benchmark it, but as a data point ICC 7 generates the movls instead
of pushes now too, (even though it generates bigger code). In fact it is even more
aggressive on that than gcc: gcc does it only for more than three or four registers,
icc does it for two and more. So I expect it being faster on Intel CPUs - at least on
the P4 - too. I doubt they tuned it for Athlons.
-Andi
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-01-06 1:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <94F20261551DC141B6B559DC4910867204491F@blr-m3-msg.wipro.com.suse.lists.linux.kernel>
[not found] ` <3E155903.F8C22286@digeo.com.suse.lists.linux.kernel>
2003-01-03 18:40 ` [BENCHMARK] Lmbench 2.5.54-mm2 (impressive improvements) Andi Kleen
2003-01-03 21:32 ` Andrew Morton
2003-01-05 1:01 ` Andrew Morton
2003-01-05 3:35 ` Linus Torvalds
2003-01-05 3:51 ` Linus Torvalds
2003-01-05 3:54 ` Andrew Morton
2003-01-05 3:52 ` Linus Torvalds
2003-01-05 10:06 ` Andi Kleen
2003-01-05 18:51 ` Linus Torvalds
2003-01-05 23:46 ` Andi Kleen
2003-01-06 1:33 ` Linus Torvalds
2003-01-06 2:05 ` Andi Kleen [this message]
2003-01-06 0:58 ` H. Peter Anvin
2003-01-05 9:18 ` Andrew Morton
2003-01-03 8:59 Aniruddha M Marathe
2003-01-03 9:33 ` Andrew Morton
2003-01-03 10:24 ` David S. Miller
2003-01-03 10:22 ` Andrew Morton
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20030106020542.GA5615@averell \
--to=ak@muc.de \
--cc=andrew.morton@digeo.com \
--cc=davem@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mikpe@csd.uu.se \
--cc=torvalds@transmeta.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox