public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: William Lee Irwin III <wli@holomorphy.com>
To: Chris Wood <cwood@xmission.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: 2.4.20, .text.lock.swap cpu usage? (ibm x440)
Date: Mon, 6 Jan 2003 15:50:24 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20030106235024.GA23814@holomorphy.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3E1A12B5.4020505@xmission.com>

On Mon, Jan 06, 2003 at 04:35:17PM -0700, Chris Wood wrote:
>   6383 .text.lock.swap                          110.0517
>   4689 .text.lock.vmscan                         28.2470
>   4486 shrink_cache                               4.6729
>    168 rw_swap_page_base                          0.6176
>    124 prune_icache                               0.5167
>     81 statm_pgd_range                            0.1534
>     51 .text.lock.inode                           0.0966
>     38 system_call                                0.6786
>     31 .text.lock.tty_io                          0.0951
>     31 .text.lock.locks                           0.1435
>     18 .text.lock.sched                           0.0373
>     16 _stext                                     0.2000
>     15 fput                                       0.0586
>     11 .text.lock.read_write                      0.0924
>      9 strnicmp                                   0.0703
>      9 do_wp_page                                 0.0110
>      9 do_page_fault                              0.0066
>      9 .text.lock.namei                           0.0073
>      9 .text.lock.fcntl                           0.0714
>      8 sys_read                                   0.0294

This is really bad lock contention. You may need 2.5.x.


Bill

  reply	other threads:[~2003-01-06 23:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-01-06 23:35 2.4.20, .text.lock.swap cpu usage? (ibm x440) Chris Wood
2003-01-06 23:50 ` William Lee Irwin III [this message]
2003-01-06 23:52 ` Andrew Morton
2003-01-09 17:17   ` Chris Wood
2003-01-09 20:18     ` Andrew Morton
2003-01-10  0:25       ` William Lee Irwin III
2003-01-10  0:44         ` Brian Tinsley
2003-01-10  0:55           ` William Lee Irwin III
2003-01-10 20:42       ` Chris Wood
2003-01-09  2:20 ` James Cleverdon
2003-01-09  2:57 ` William Lee Irwin III
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-01-10  3:17 Brian Tinsley
2003-01-10  3:29 ` William Lee Irwin III
2003-01-10  3:42   ` Brian Tinsley
2003-01-10  3:54     ` William Lee Irwin III
2003-01-10  4:08       ` Brian Tinsley
2003-01-10  4:19         ` William Lee Irwin III
2003-01-10  4:50           ` Brian Tinsley
2003-01-10  5:17             ` Martin J. Bligh
2003-01-10  5:24             ` William Lee Irwin III
2003-01-10  5:45               ` Brian Tinsley

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20030106235024.GA23814@holomorphy.com \
    --to=wli@holomorphy.com \
    --cc=cwood@xmission.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox