public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* dm fs?
@ 2003-01-05 21:37 Jeff Garzik
  2003-01-06  9:43 ` [lvm-devel] " Joe Thornber
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Jeff Garzik @ 2003-01-05 21:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: lvm-devel, linux-kernel

What is the status of dmfs going into mainline?

I saw that Greg KH posted a patch with some corrections to dmfs for
2.5.50?

IMO it would be nice to have a kernel config option that makes the
ioctl method optional when dmfs is set to y or m in kernel config.
That will not only save a bit of code space, but it will also serve to
encourage use of dmfs.  :)

	Jeff




^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: [lvm-devel] dm fs?
  2003-01-05 21:37 dm fs? Jeff Garzik
@ 2003-01-06  9:43 ` Joe Thornber
  2003-01-07  1:44   ` Greg KH
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Joe Thornber @ 2003-01-06  9:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: lvm-devel; +Cc: linux-kernel

On Sun, Jan 05, 2003 at 04:37:28PM -0500, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> What is the status of dmfs going into mainline?
> 
> I saw that Greg KH posted a patch with some corrections to dmfs for
> 2.5.50?
> 
> IMO it would be nice to have a kernel config option that makes the
> ioctl method optional when dmfs is set to y or m in kernel config.
> That will not only save a bit of code space, but it will also serve to
> encourage use of dmfs.  :)

The last version I released is here: 

http://people.sistina.com/~thornber/patches/2.5-unstable/2.5.51/2.5.51-dmfs-1.tar.bz2

There are still a couple of easy to fix issues with it (eg. the
kmalloc while a spin lock is held that Andrew Morton pointed out :).

Both Andrew Morton and Greg KH expressed concerns with the way I've
mapped the dm semantics onto the filesystem
(http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-kernel&m=103975736919315&w=2).
So Greg is currently trying to get a sysfs interface working.

We need to get a concensus of opinion in the community as to what is a
good interface.  I'm not going to be rushed into including something
in dm that could cause critism for years to come.  dmfs is what
Alasdair Kergon and I have proposed, we're just waiting for an
alternative to kick off the discussions ATM.

- Joe

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: [lvm-devel] dm fs?
  2003-01-06  9:43 ` [lvm-devel] " Joe Thornber
@ 2003-01-07  1:44   ` Greg KH
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Greg KH @ 2003-01-07  1:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Joe Thornber; +Cc: lvm-devel, linux-kernel

On Mon, Jan 06, 2003 at 09:43:17AM +0000, Joe Thornber wrote:
> 
> Both Andrew Morton and Greg KH expressed concerns with the way I've
> mapped the dm semantics onto the filesystem
> (http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-kernel&m=103975736919315&w=2).
> So Greg is currently trying to get a sysfs interface working.

Yes, and hopefully I'll have something that works later this week, after
I've dug out under this mount of email...

thanks,

gre k-h

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2003-01-07  1:36 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2003-01-05 21:37 dm fs? Jeff Garzik
2003-01-06  9:43 ` [lvm-devel] " Joe Thornber
2003-01-07  1:44   ` Greg KH

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox