public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Kaleb Pederson <kibab@icehouse.net>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: windows=stable, linux=5 reboots/50 min
Date: Tue, 07 Jan 2003 06:28:10 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200301070628.17747.kibab@icehouse.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20030107095406.GH2141@vagabond>

[-- Attachment #1: signed data --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 1229 bytes --]

I'm now pretty sure that it is a hardware failure of some type.  Windows was 
stable last night for about four hours of compiling, graphics manipulations, 
etc.  But, when I got home after being gone for several hours, Windows 
started exhibiting the same behavior.  I presume it is Linux sensitivity to 
hardware that made it show up 5 days sooner.  I'm presume, at this point, 
that it is either the motherboard or one of the processors.

Thank you everyone for your suggestions.  Of the many messages I received, the 
following were good and relevant to my system and I will try them to see if 
it does make a difference.

1) Try disabling apm/acpi in bios (I had done this in the kernel, not in 
bios).
2) Try a uniprocessor kernel or booting with only one processor
3) mount /var synchronous to see if anything shows up in the logs (I had 
checked the logs and nothing was getting written to it.  I had forgotten that 
you could make the whole file system synchronous; I'll try this.)
4) Increase voltage to the processors and see if it helps.

Per some other questions, I'm not using scsi nor do I have an intel 82801DB 
chip onboard.

Thanks again for the help.

--Kaleb
PS: Please CC me any responses that go to the list.

[-- Attachment #2: signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2003-01-07 22:21 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-01-07  6:57 windows=stable, linux=5 reboots/50 min Kaleb Pederson
2003-01-06 19:12 ` Adam Belay
2003-01-06 23:52 ` Alan Cox
2003-01-07  4:42 ` Billy Rose
2003-01-07  5:28 ` Billy Rose
2003-01-07  9:54 ` Jan Hudec
2003-01-07 14:28   ` Kaleb Pederson [this message]
2003-01-07 16:22 ` Bernd Schubert
2003-01-07 21:57 ` Andreas Tscharner
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-01-07  9:19 Kaleb Pederson

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200301070628.17747.kibab@icehouse.net \
    --to=kibab@icehouse.net \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox