From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 7 Jan 2003 05:35:39 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 7 Jan 2003 05:35:38 -0500 Received: from twilight.ucw.cz ([195.39.74.230]:27798 "EHLO twilight.ucw.cz") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Tue, 7 Jan 2003 05:35:38 -0500 Date: Tue, 7 Jan 2003 11:44:03 +0100 From: Vojtech Pavlik To: Rusty Russell Cc: Pavel Machek , kernel list Subject: Re: include order for i2c-amd8111 Message-ID: <20030107114403.A5029@ucw.cz> References: <20030105231349.GA8714@elf.ucw.cz> <20030106004057.127332C0AA@lists.samba.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <20030106004057.127332C0AA@lists.samba.org>; from rusty@rustcorp.com.au on Mon, Jan 06, 2003 at 11:40:20AM +1100 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Jan 06, 2003 at 11:40:20AM +1100, Rusty Russell wrote: > In message <20030105231349.GA8714@elf.ucw.cz> you write: > > Hi! > > > > It seems all linux then all asm is prefered order... > > Pavel > > Yes, but not for any great reason, AFAICT. I think this comes under > the "too trivial" rule (ie. I'll accept it from the author, but not > someone else). The author (me ;) definitely doesn't mind you applying the patch, but would prefer if the one who pushed the 8111 driver into the kernel (Pavel) would update it to the version found in lm_sensors 2.7.0 at the same time. Thanks. -- Vojtech Pavlik SuSE Labs