From: John Bradford <john@grabjohn.com>
To: john@grabjohn.com (John Bradford)
Cc: rddunlap@osdl.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Undelete files on ext3 ??
Date: Wed, 8 Jan 2003 23:14:40 +0000 (GMT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200301082314.h08NEe56003842@darkstar.example.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200301082303.h08N3bvI003752@darkstar.example.net> from "John Bradford" at Jan 08, 2003 11:03:37 PM
> > > | > > What I was thinking of was a virtual device that allocated
> > > | > > a new sector whenever an old one was overwritten - kind of
> > > | > > like a journaled filesystem, but without the filesystem,
> > > | > > (I.E. just the journal) :-).
> > > | >
> > > | > $ DIR FOO.TXT;*
> > > | > FOO.TXT;1 FOO.TXT;2 FOO.TXT;2
> > > | >
> > > | > VMS-style file versioning, anybody? ;)
> > > |
> > > | Brilliant!
> > >
> > > re-read the archives from 6-8 months ago.
> >
> > http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-kernel&m=101914252421742&w=2
>
> So basically the idea already already exists:
>
> http://www.netcraft.com.au/geoffrey/katie/
>
> Brilliant! :-)
Although I was originally thinking of doing it at sector level, rather
than at filesystem level.
John.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-01-08 23:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-01-07 3:58 Undelete files on ext3 ?? Max Valdez
2003-01-07 8:59 ` Marco d'Itri
2003-01-07 8:59 ` John Bradford
2003-01-07 9:29 ` Maciej Soltysiak
2003-01-07 9:45 ` Jan Hudec
2003-01-07 17:38 ` Max Valdez
2003-01-07 17:53 ` Andreas Dilger
2003-01-07 17:57 ` John Bradford
2003-01-07 18:56 ` Andreas Dilger
2003-01-07 18:17 ` Richard B. Johnson
2003-01-07 18:41 ` Virtual WORM device John Bradford
2003-01-07 18:53 ` Andreas Dilger
2003-01-07 18:54 ` John Bradford
2003-01-08 18:24 ` Vishal Verma
2003-01-07 18:45 ` Undelete files on ext3 ?? Jesse Pollard
2003-01-07 18:55 ` Andreas Dilger
2003-01-08 5:01 ` Gerhard Mack
2003-01-08 8:00 ` Jan Hudec
2003-01-08 10:57 ` John Bradford
2003-01-08 21:33 ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2003-01-08 21:47 ` John Bradford
2003-01-08 21:51 ` Randy.Dunlap
2003-01-08 22:06 ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2003-01-08 23:03 ` John Bradford
2003-01-08 23:14 ` John Bradford [this message]
2003-01-09 9:42 ` Helge Hafting
2003-01-07 20:58 ` Mike Waychison
2003-01-09 8:27 ` Michael Knigge
[not found] ` <Pine.LNX.3.95.1030107131613.3523A-100000@chaos.analogic.co m>
2003-01-07 23:51 ` Billy Rose
2003-01-07 11:30 ` John Bradford
2003-01-07 11:45 ` Matti Aarnio
2003-01-07 12:39 ` Alan Cox
2003-01-08 20:00 ` Michael Milligan
2003-01-07 9:16 ` David van Hoose
2003-01-07 19:31 ` oford
2003-01-08 11:57 ` Pavel Machek
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-01-07 9:58 Alexander Sandler
2003-01-08 10:03 bart
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200301082314.h08NEe56003842@darkstar.example.net \
--to=john@grabjohn.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rddunlap@osdl.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox