From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 9 Jan 2003 12:16:15 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 9 Jan 2003 12:16:15 -0500 Received: from noodles.codemonkey.org.uk ([213.152.47.19]:6380 "EHLO noodles.internal") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Thu, 9 Jan 2003 12:16:14 -0500 Date: Thu, 9 Jan 2003 17:22:29 +0000 From: Dave Jones To: Alan Cox Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List Subject: Re: [PATCH] PATCH: IPMI driver Message-ID: <20030109172229.GA27288@codemonkey.org.uk> Mail-Followup-To: Dave Jones , Alan Cox , Linux Kernel Mailing List References: <200301090332.h093WML05981@hera.kernel.org> <20030109164407.GA26195@codemonkey.org.uk> <1042135594.27796.37.camel@irongate.swansea.linux.org.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1042135594.27796.37.camel@irongate.swansea.linux.org.uk> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Jan 09, 2003 at 06:06:34PM +0000, Alan Cox wrote: > Arghhh I was told Linus accepted it, and my tree indexer found "IPMI" so > decided it was present too. (Only the i2c definitions apparently). Shouldn't cause any problems in 2.4 anyways should it ? After all, its 'just another driver'. > Oh well, it should be in 2.5 Added to the queue of bits from the 2.4 changesets list that I'm intending to push to Linus soon. Dave -- | Dave Jones. http://www.codemonkey.org.uk | SuSE Labs