Re: any chance of 2.6.0-test*?

Ryan Anderson
2003-01-13T01:52:10Z

On Sun, Jan 12, 2003 at 05:51:57PM -0500, Rob Wilkens wrote:
> On Sun, 2003-01-12 at 17:43, Oliver Neukum wrote:
> > It's code that causes added hardship for anybody checking the locking.
>
> I can certainly see where it would seem "easier" to match "one lock" to
> "one unlock" if your troubleshooting a locking issue.
>
> "easier" is the motivation behind using goto.. Laziness.. that's all it
> is.

Have you ever read "Programming Perl"?

Laziness is a virtue. (At least I think that's the right book -
possibly the 3rd edition.)

--

Ryan Anderson
sometimes Pug Majere