Re: any chance of 2.6.0-test*?

Emiliano Gabrielli
2003-01-12T23:37:08Z

<quote who="Oliver Neukum">
> Am Montag, 13. Januar 2003 00:05 schrieb Emiliano Gabrielli:
>> <quote who="Rob Wilkens">
>>
>> > On Sun, 2003-01-12 at 17:43, Oliver Neukum wrote:
>> >> It's code that causes added hardship for anybody checking the locking.
>> >
>> > I can certainly see where it would seem "easier" to match "one lock" to "one
>> unlock" if your troubleshooting a locking issue.
>> >
>> > "easier" is the motivation behind using goto.. Laziness.. that's all it is.
>>
>> In italy we say "Non c'è peggior sordo di chi non vuole sentire"
>
> There's no worse fate than that of those who don't want to listen? (My Italian is
> bad.)

It is better than my english :-))

>
>> Till to this point the thread was useful to beginners becouse of a lot of smarty
>> coders explained a point that everyone has heard but that rarely knows at deep...
>>
>> but now Let's ignore him ! He is not a beginner he is a lamer!
>
> Very well. What could be said has been said. But please don't insult him. Time spent
> explaining is usually well spent. Perhaps somebody learned.
>

I agree .. my apologises .. I use currently the word "lamer" in IRC, but I don't really
know the true translation.. if it is an insult .. plz adcept my apologises

> OK, maybe I have a soft spot.
>

:-)

> Regards
> Oliver

--
Emiliano Gabrielli

dip. di Fisica
2° Università di Roma "Tor Vergata"