Re: any chance of 2.6.0-test*?

Pavel Machek
2003-01-20T19:50:05Z

Hi!

> > - Flaws in error recovery paths in certain situations
> > - Lots of random oopses on boot/remove that were apparently
> > introduced by the kobject/sysfs people and need chasing
> > down. (There are some non sysfs ones mostly fixed)
>
> I guess the kobject/sysfs stuff could be ripped out if it doesn't
> work - it is probably not a "must have" feature.

sysfs is needed to properly flush caches on powerdown and for
S3/S4 suspend/resume to work.
Pavel
--
Worst form of spam? Adding advertisment signatures ala sourceforge.net.
What goes next? Inserting advertisment *into* email?