From: Dominik Brodowski <linux@brodo.de>
To: Alessandro Suardi <ALESSANDRO.SUARDI@oracle.com>
Cc: andrew.grover@intel.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Kernel 2.5.55 failed to boot with ACPI support
Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2003 16:11:59 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20030113151159.GA10921@brodo.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <7071726.1042419087751.JavaMail.nobody@web55.us.oracle.com>
Hi!
On Sun, Jan 12, 2003 at 04:51:27PM -0800, Alessandro Suardi wrote:
> Dominik Brodowski wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Jan 13, 2003 at 12:04:02AM +0100, Alessandro Suardi wrote:
> > > Andrew Grover wrote:
> > >
> > > > > From: Ole J. Hagen [mailto:olehag_2001@yahoo.no]
> > > > > I just wanted to inform that kernel-2.5.55 failes to boot
> > > > > when ACPI support is
> > > > > compiled in the kernel.
> > > > >
> > > > > I have following configuration; Dell Optiplex GX-240, Pentium
> > > > > 4 (1.5 GHz), ATI RAGE 128.
> > > >
> > > > How exactly does it fail?
> > >
> > > My brand new Dell Latitude C640 oopses on boot in 2.5.56 if I
> > > have CPU_FREQ config'd in. ACPI without CPU_FREQ is okay - well,
> > > it screws my framebuffer screen (what 2.4.21-pre3 doesn't) when
> > > the ACPI code does its bootup printk's, but after that the
> > > screen recovers.
> > >
> > > ...
> > >
> > > Back on topic, if you're interested I can rebuild my 2.5.56 with
> > > CPU_FREQ and write down the backtrace of the oops.
> > Would be great if you could do that - and tell what oops it is (NULL pointer
> > dereference etc.), in case you still see that on your screen.
>
> Sigh :(
>
> Rebuilt with CPU_FREQ, doesn't oops.
:)
> It says
>
> cpufreq: Intel(R) SpeedStep(TM) for this processor not (yet) available
>
> Is the above message expected ? The CPU is a 1.8Ghz mobile P4.
2.5.56, you say... let me check... yep, then this patch is missing (it's in
2.5.56-bk). Could you send me a /proc/cpuinfo, please? Especially if this
patch doesn't work :)
Dominik
diff -ruN linux-original/arch/i386/kernel/cpu/cpufreq/speedstep.c linux/arch/i386/kernel/cpu/cpufreq/speedstep.c
--- linux-original/arch/i386/kernel/cpu/cpufreq/speedstep.c 2003-01-10 21:55:28.000000000 +0100
+++ linux/arch/i386/kernel/cpu/cpufreq/speedstep.c 2003-01-10 22:13:33.000000000 +0100
@@ -447,7 +447,7 @@
if (c->x86_model != 2)
return 0;
- if (c->x86_mask != 4)
+ if ((c->x86_mask != 4) && (c->x86_mask != 7))
return 0;
ebx = cpuid_ebx(0x00000001);
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-01-13 15:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-01-13 0:51 Kernel 2.5.55 failed to boot with ACPI support Alessandro Suardi
2003-01-13 15:11 ` Dominik Brodowski [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-01-12 22:48 Alessandro Suardi
[not found] ` <5028.1042412642@www10.gmx.net>
2003-01-12 23:08 ` Dominik Brodowski
2003-01-10 21:10 Grover, Andrew
2003-01-11 2:07 ` Ole J. Hagen
2003-01-10 19:42 [Linux-fbdev-devel] rotation James Simmons
2003-01-10 21:10 ` Kernel 2.5.55 failed to boot with ACPI support Ole J. Hagen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20030113151159.GA10921@brodo.de \
--to=linux@brodo.de \
--cc=ALESSANDRO.SUARDI@oracle.com \
--cc=andrew.grover@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox