From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 14 Jan 2003 09:46:48 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 14 Jan 2003 09:46:48 -0500 Received: from 12-231-249-244.client.attbi.com ([12.231.249.244]:32520 "HELO kroah.com") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Tue, 14 Jan 2003 09:46:47 -0500 Date: Tue, 14 Jan 2003 06:55:29 -0800 From: Greg KH To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: usb broken in 2.5? Message-ID: <20030114145529.GA14672@kroah.com> References: <20030114024435.GA1293@fefe.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20030114024435.GA1293@fefe.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Jan 14, 2003 at 03:44:35AM +0100, Felix von Leitner wrote: > In 2.5.57 USB does not work. The mainboard devices are still detected, > and apparently also the USB devices are found, but then the USB code > tries to remap them and fails. It tries again with 1.5 Mb/s and fails > again. This sounds like the old iterrupt routing problem that ACPI causes at times, and not a USB problem (the interrupts aren't getting to the controller, nothing the USB controller can do about that...) > > usb_control/bulk_msg: timeout > > usb.c: USB device not accepting new address=3 (error=-110) > > The same problem also happens with the WOLK kernel patch, which appears > to also include a newer version of the USB code. Newer version? Where would the WOLK people get that from, as the stuff in the main tree is the newest. Since you said you are using ACPI, I'd suggest taking this up with the ACPI developers. thanks, greg k-h