From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 14 Jan 2003 20:06:07 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 14 Jan 2003 20:06:07 -0500 Received: from are.twiddle.net ([64.81.246.98]:46728 "EHLO are.twiddle.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Tue, 14 Jan 2003 20:06:05 -0500 Date: Tue, 14 Jan 2003 17:14:57 -0800 From: Richard Henderson To: Rusty Russell Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, davem@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [module-init-tools] fix weak symbol handling Message-ID: <20030114171457.E5751@twiddle.net> Mail-Followup-To: Rusty Russell , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, davem@vger.kernel.org References: <20030113110457.A936@twiddle.net> <20030114032138.7B1482C40D@lists.samba.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i In-Reply-To: <20030114032138.7B1482C40D@lists.samba.org>; from rusty@rustcorp.com.au on Tue, Jan 14, 2003 at 02:16:57PM +1100 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Jan 14, 2003 at 02:16:57PM +1100, Rusty Russell wrote: > So the semantics you want are that if A declares a weak symbol S, and > B exports a (presumably non-weak) symbol S, then A depends on B? No. The semantics I need is if A references a weak symbol S and *no one* implements it, then S resolves to NULL. r~